Article Type
Article
Changed
Wed, 10/09/2019 - 16:30
Author(s)
Jack Lee, MD
Kerrie M. Grunnet, MD
Richard H. Flowers, MD
Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD
Mary-Margaret B. Noland, MD
Jerome Goddard, PhD

 

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 65-year-old woman presented to the dermatology clinic in July with a pruritic rash of 2 days’ duration that started on the back and spread diffusely. The patient gardened regularly. Physical examination showed inflammatory papules and pustules on the back (Figure 1), as well as the groin, breasts, and ears. There was a punctate black dot in the center of some papules, and dermoscopy revealed ticks (Figure 2). Removal and microscopic examination confirmed larval-stage lone star ticks (Figure 3). The patient was prescribed topical steroids for pruritus as well as oral doxycycline for prophylaxis against tick-borne illnesses.

Figure 1. Multiple inflammatory papules and pustules on the back (patient 1).

Figure 2. Dermoscopic view of an inflammatory papule with a punctate black dot revealed central attachment of a tick (patient 1). Dermoscopy prevented misdiagnosis as hemorrhagic crust.

Figure 3. Microscopic image of a lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) with 6 legs (extracted from patient 1), consistent with a larval-stage tick.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man presented to the same clinic in July with pruritic lesions on the back, legs, ankles, and scrotum of 3 days’ duration that first appeared 24 hours after performing yardwork. Physical examination revealed diffusely distributed papules, pustules, and vesicles on the back (Figure 4). Some papules featured a punctate black dot in the center (similar to patient 1), and dermoscopy again revealed ticks. Removal and microscopic examination confirmed larval-stage ticks. The patient was treated with topical steroids and oral antihistamines for pruritus as well as prophylactic oral doxycycline.

Figure 4. Diffuse pruritic papules, pustules, and vesicles on the back (patient 2).

Comment

Ticks are well-known human parasites, representing the second most common vector of human infectious disease.1 Ticks have 3 motile stages: larva (or “seed”), nymph, and adult. They can bite humans during all stages. Larval ticks, distinguished by having 6 legs rather than 8 legs in nymphs and adults, can attack in droves and cause an infestation that presents as diffuse, pruritic, erythematous papules and pustules.2-4 The first report of larval tick infestation in humans may have been in 1728 by William Byrd who described finding ticks on the skin that were too small to see without a microscope.5

Identification
The ticks in both of our cases were lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum). The larval stage of A americanum is a proven cause of cutaneous reaction.6,7 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE as well as a Google Scholar search using the terms tick, seed tick, or tick bite in combination with rash, eruption, infestation, papule, pustule, or pruritic revealed 6 reported cases of larval tick infestation in the literature (including our case); 5 were caused by A americanum and 1 by Ixodes dammini (now known as Ixodes scapularis); all occurred in July or August.3,7-10 This time frame is consistent with the general tick life cycle across species: Adults feed from April to June, then lay eggs that hatch into larval ticks within 4 to 6 weeks. After hatching, larval ticks climb grass and weeds awaiting a passing host.4

Diagnosis
Larval tick infestation remains a frequently misdiagnosed etiology of diffuse pruritic papules and pustules, especially in urban settings where physicians are less likely to be familiar with this type of manifestation.3,9-11 Larval ticks are submillimeter in size and difficult to appreciate with the naked eye, contributing to misdiagnosis. A punctate black dot may sometimes be seen in papules; however, dermoscopy is critical for accurate diagnosis, as hemorrhagic crust is a frequent misdiagnosis.



Management
In addition to symptomatic therapy, both of our patients received doxycycline as antibiotic prophylaxis for tick-borne illnesses given that a high number of ticks had been attached for more than 2 days.12,13 Antibiotic prophylaxis for tick-borne illness is controversial. The exception is Lyme disease transmitted by nymphal or adult I scapularis when specific conditions are met: the bite must have occurred in an endemic area, doxycycline cannot be contraindicated, estimated duration of attachment is at least 36 hours, and prophylaxis must be started within 72 hours of tick removal.13 There are no official recommendations for the A americanum species or for larval-stage ticks of any species. Larval-stage ticks acting as vectors for disease transmission is not well documented in recent literature, and there currently is limited evidence supporting prophylactic antibiotics for larval tick bites. The presence of spotted fever rickettsioses has been reported (with the exception of Rickettsia rickettsii and Ehrlichia chaffeensis) in larval A americanum ticks, suggesting a theoretical possibility that they could act as disease vectors.3,8,11,14-17 At a minimum, both prompt tick removal and close patient follow-up is warranted.

Conclusion

Human infestation with larval ticks is a common occurrence but can present a diagnostic challenge to an unfamiliar physician. We encourage consideration of larval tick infestation as the etiology of multiple or diffuse pruritic papules with a history of outdoor exposure.

References
  1. Sonenshine DE. Biology of Ticks. New York, NY: Oxford University; 1991.
  2. Alexander JOD. The effects of tick bites. In: Alexander JOD. Arthropods and Human Skin. London, England: Springer London; 1984:363-382.
  3. Duckworth PF Jr, Hayden GF, Reed CN. Human infestation by Amblyomma americanum larvae (“seed ticks”). South Med J. 1985;78:751-753.
  4. Parola P, Raoult D. Ticks and tickborne bacterial diseases in humans: an emerging infectious threat. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:897-928.
  5. Cropley TG. William Byrd on ticks, 1728. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:187.
  6. Goddard J. A ten-year study of tick biting in Mississippi: implications for human disease transmission. J Agromedicine. 2002;8:25-32.
  7. Goddard J, Portugal JS. Cutaneous lesions due to bites by larval Amblyomma americanum ticks. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1373-1375.
  8. Fibeger EA, Erickson QL, Weintraub BD, et al. Larval tick infestation: a case report and review of tick-borne disease. Cutis. 2008;82:38-46.
  9. Jones BE. Human ‘seed tick’ infestation: Amblyomma americanum larvae. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:812-814.
  10. Fisher EJ, Mo J, Lucky AW. Multiple pruritic papules from lone star tick larvae bites. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:491-494.
  11. Culp JS. Seed ticks. Am Fam Physician. 1987;36:121-123.
  12. Perea AE, Hinckley AF, Mead PS. Tick bite prophylaxis: results from a 2012 survey of healthcare providers. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:388-392.
  13. Tick bites/prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/tickbornediseases/tick-bites-prevention.html. Revised January 10, 2019. Accessed September 17, 2019.
  14. Moncayo AC, Cohen SB, Fritzen CM, et al. Absence of Rickettsia rickettsii and occurrence of other spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks from Tennessee. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:653-657.
  15. Castellaw AH, Showers J, Goddard J, et al. Detection of vector-borne agents in lone star ticks, Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae), from Mississippi. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:473-476.
  16. Stromdahl EY, Vince MA, Billingsley PM, et al. Rickettsia amblyommii infecting Amblyomma americanum larvae. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:15-24.
  17. Long SW, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. Evaluation of transovarial transmission and transmissibility of Ehrlichia chaffeensis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2003;40:1000-1004.
Article PDF
CT104004001_e.PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Lee, Flowers, Zlotoff, and Noland are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. Dr. Grunnet is from the Division of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. Dr. Goddard is from the Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Starkville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jack Lee, MD, PO Box 800718, University of Virginia, Department of Dermatology, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0718 (jl4eg@virginia.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 104(4)
Publications
MDedge Dermatology
Cutis
Topics
Infectious Diseases
Page Number
E1-E3
Sections
Case Reports
Author(s)
Jack Lee, MD
Kerrie M. Grunnet, MD
Richard H. Flowers, MD
Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD
Mary-Margaret B. Noland, MD
Jerome Goddard, PhD
Author(s)
Jack Lee, MD
Kerrie M. Grunnet, MD
Richard H. Flowers, MD
Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD
Mary-Margaret B. Noland, MD
Jerome Goddard, PhD
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Lee, Flowers, Zlotoff, and Noland are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. Dr. Grunnet is from the Division of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. Dr. Goddard is from the Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Starkville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jack Lee, MD, PO Box 800718, University of Virginia, Department of Dermatology, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0718 (jl4eg@virginia.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Lee, Flowers, Zlotoff, and Noland are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. Dr. Grunnet is from the Division of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. Dr. Goddard is from the Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Starkville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jack Lee, MD, PO Box 800718, University of Virginia, Department of Dermatology, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0718 (jl4eg@virginia.edu).

Article PDF
CT104004001_e.PDF
Article PDF
CT104004001_e.PDF

 

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 65-year-old woman presented to the dermatology clinic in July with a pruritic rash of 2 days’ duration that started on the back and spread diffusely. The patient gardened regularly. Physical examination showed inflammatory papules and pustules on the back (Figure 1), as well as the groin, breasts, and ears. There was a punctate black dot in the center of some papules, and dermoscopy revealed ticks (Figure 2). Removal and microscopic examination confirmed larval-stage lone star ticks (Figure 3). The patient was prescribed topical steroids for pruritus as well as oral doxycycline for prophylaxis against tick-borne illnesses.

Figure 1. Multiple inflammatory papules and pustules on the back (patient 1).

Figure 2. Dermoscopic view of an inflammatory papule with a punctate black dot revealed central attachment of a tick (patient 1). Dermoscopy prevented misdiagnosis as hemorrhagic crust.

Figure 3. Microscopic image of a lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) with 6 legs (extracted from patient 1), consistent with a larval-stage tick.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man presented to the same clinic in July with pruritic lesions on the back, legs, ankles, and scrotum of 3 days’ duration that first appeared 24 hours after performing yardwork. Physical examination revealed diffusely distributed papules, pustules, and vesicles on the back (Figure 4). Some papules featured a punctate black dot in the center (similar to patient 1), and dermoscopy again revealed ticks. Removal and microscopic examination confirmed larval-stage ticks. The patient was treated with topical steroids and oral antihistamines for pruritus as well as prophylactic oral doxycycline.

Figure 4. Diffuse pruritic papules, pustules, and vesicles on the back (patient 2).

Comment

Ticks are well-known human parasites, representing the second most common vector of human infectious disease.1 Ticks have 3 motile stages: larva (or “seed”), nymph, and adult. They can bite humans during all stages. Larval ticks, distinguished by having 6 legs rather than 8 legs in nymphs and adults, can attack in droves and cause an infestation that presents as diffuse, pruritic, erythematous papules and pustules.2-4 The first report of larval tick infestation in humans may have been in 1728 by William Byrd who described finding ticks on the skin that were too small to see without a microscope.5

Identification
The ticks in both of our cases were lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum). The larval stage of A americanum is a proven cause of cutaneous reaction.6,7 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE as well as a Google Scholar search using the terms tick, seed tick, or tick bite in combination with rash, eruption, infestation, papule, pustule, or pruritic revealed 6 reported cases of larval tick infestation in the literature (including our case); 5 were caused by A americanum and 1 by Ixodes dammini (now known as Ixodes scapularis); all occurred in July or August.3,7-10 This time frame is consistent with the general tick life cycle across species: Adults feed from April to June, then lay eggs that hatch into larval ticks within 4 to 6 weeks. After hatching, larval ticks climb grass and weeds awaiting a passing host.4

Diagnosis
Larval tick infestation remains a frequently misdiagnosed etiology of diffuse pruritic papules and pustules, especially in urban settings where physicians are less likely to be familiar with this type of manifestation.3,9-11 Larval ticks are submillimeter in size and difficult to appreciate with the naked eye, contributing to misdiagnosis. A punctate black dot may sometimes be seen in papules; however, dermoscopy is critical for accurate diagnosis, as hemorrhagic crust is a frequent misdiagnosis.



Management
In addition to symptomatic therapy, both of our patients received doxycycline as antibiotic prophylaxis for tick-borne illnesses given that a high number of ticks had been attached for more than 2 days.12,13 Antibiotic prophylaxis for tick-borne illness is controversial. The exception is Lyme disease transmitted by nymphal or adult I scapularis when specific conditions are met: the bite must have occurred in an endemic area, doxycycline cannot be contraindicated, estimated duration of attachment is at least 36 hours, and prophylaxis must be started within 72 hours of tick removal.13 There are no official recommendations for the A americanum species or for larval-stage ticks of any species. Larval-stage ticks acting as vectors for disease transmission is not well documented in recent literature, and there currently is limited evidence supporting prophylactic antibiotics for larval tick bites. The presence of spotted fever rickettsioses has been reported (with the exception of Rickettsia rickettsii and Ehrlichia chaffeensis) in larval A americanum ticks, suggesting a theoretical possibility that they could act as disease vectors.3,8,11,14-17 At a minimum, both prompt tick removal and close patient follow-up is warranted.

Conclusion

Human infestation with larval ticks is a common occurrence but can present a diagnostic challenge to an unfamiliar physician. We encourage consideration of larval tick infestation as the etiology of multiple or diffuse pruritic papules with a history of outdoor exposure.

 

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 65-year-old woman presented to the dermatology clinic in July with a pruritic rash of 2 days’ duration that started on the back and spread diffusely. The patient gardened regularly. Physical examination showed inflammatory papules and pustules on the back (Figure 1), as well as the groin, breasts, and ears. There was a punctate black dot in the center of some papules, and dermoscopy revealed ticks (Figure 2). Removal and microscopic examination confirmed larval-stage lone star ticks (Figure 3). The patient was prescribed topical steroids for pruritus as well as oral doxycycline for prophylaxis against tick-borne illnesses.

Figure 1. Multiple inflammatory papules and pustules on the back (patient 1).

Figure 2. Dermoscopic view of an inflammatory papule with a punctate black dot revealed central attachment of a tick (patient 1). Dermoscopy prevented misdiagnosis as hemorrhagic crust.

Figure 3. Microscopic image of a lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) with 6 legs (extracted from patient 1), consistent with a larval-stage tick.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man presented to the same clinic in July with pruritic lesions on the back, legs, ankles, and scrotum of 3 days’ duration that first appeared 24 hours after performing yardwork. Physical examination revealed diffusely distributed papules, pustules, and vesicles on the back (Figure 4). Some papules featured a punctate black dot in the center (similar to patient 1), and dermoscopy again revealed ticks. Removal and microscopic examination confirmed larval-stage ticks. The patient was treated with topical steroids and oral antihistamines for pruritus as well as prophylactic oral doxycycline.

Figure 4. Diffuse pruritic papules, pustules, and vesicles on the back (patient 2).

Comment

Ticks are well-known human parasites, representing the second most common vector of human infectious disease.1 Ticks have 3 motile stages: larva (or “seed”), nymph, and adult. They can bite humans during all stages. Larval ticks, distinguished by having 6 legs rather than 8 legs in nymphs and adults, can attack in droves and cause an infestation that presents as diffuse, pruritic, erythematous papules and pustules.2-4 The first report of larval tick infestation in humans may have been in 1728 by William Byrd who described finding ticks on the skin that were too small to see without a microscope.5

Identification
The ticks in both of our cases were lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum). The larval stage of A americanum is a proven cause of cutaneous reaction.6,7 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE as well as a Google Scholar search using the terms tick, seed tick, or tick bite in combination with rash, eruption, infestation, papule, pustule, or pruritic revealed 6 reported cases of larval tick infestation in the literature (including our case); 5 were caused by A americanum and 1 by Ixodes dammini (now known as Ixodes scapularis); all occurred in July or August.3,7-10 This time frame is consistent with the general tick life cycle across species: Adults feed from April to June, then lay eggs that hatch into larval ticks within 4 to 6 weeks. After hatching, larval ticks climb grass and weeds awaiting a passing host.4

Diagnosis
Larval tick infestation remains a frequently misdiagnosed etiology of diffuse pruritic papules and pustules, especially in urban settings where physicians are less likely to be familiar with this type of manifestation.3,9-11 Larval ticks are submillimeter in size and difficult to appreciate with the naked eye, contributing to misdiagnosis. A punctate black dot may sometimes be seen in papules; however, dermoscopy is critical for accurate diagnosis, as hemorrhagic crust is a frequent misdiagnosis.



Management
In addition to symptomatic therapy, both of our patients received doxycycline as antibiotic prophylaxis for tick-borne illnesses given that a high number of ticks had been attached for more than 2 days.12,13 Antibiotic prophylaxis for tick-borne illness is controversial. The exception is Lyme disease transmitted by nymphal or adult I scapularis when specific conditions are met: the bite must have occurred in an endemic area, doxycycline cannot be contraindicated, estimated duration of attachment is at least 36 hours, and prophylaxis must be started within 72 hours of tick removal.13 There are no official recommendations for the A americanum species or for larval-stage ticks of any species. Larval-stage ticks acting as vectors for disease transmission is not well documented in recent literature, and there currently is limited evidence supporting prophylactic antibiotics for larval tick bites. The presence of spotted fever rickettsioses has been reported (with the exception of Rickettsia rickettsii and Ehrlichia chaffeensis) in larval A americanum ticks, suggesting a theoretical possibility that they could act as disease vectors.3,8,11,14-17 At a minimum, both prompt tick removal and close patient follow-up is warranted.

Conclusion

Human infestation with larval ticks is a common occurrence but can present a diagnostic challenge to an unfamiliar physician. We encourage consideration of larval tick infestation as the etiology of multiple or diffuse pruritic papules with a history of outdoor exposure.

References
  1. Sonenshine DE. Biology of Ticks. New York, NY: Oxford University; 1991.
  2. Alexander JOD. The effects of tick bites. In: Alexander JOD. Arthropods and Human Skin. London, England: Springer London; 1984:363-382.
  3. Duckworth PF Jr, Hayden GF, Reed CN. Human infestation by Amblyomma americanum larvae (“seed ticks”). South Med J. 1985;78:751-753.
  4. Parola P, Raoult D. Ticks and tickborne bacterial diseases in humans: an emerging infectious threat. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:897-928.
  5. Cropley TG. William Byrd on ticks, 1728. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:187.
  6. Goddard J. A ten-year study of tick biting in Mississippi: implications for human disease transmission. J Agromedicine. 2002;8:25-32.
  7. Goddard J, Portugal JS. Cutaneous lesions due to bites by larval Amblyomma americanum ticks. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1373-1375.
  8. Fibeger EA, Erickson QL, Weintraub BD, et al. Larval tick infestation: a case report and review of tick-borne disease. Cutis. 2008;82:38-46.
  9. Jones BE. Human ‘seed tick’ infestation: Amblyomma americanum larvae. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:812-814.
  10. Fisher EJ, Mo J, Lucky AW. Multiple pruritic papules from lone star tick larvae bites. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:491-494.
  11. Culp JS. Seed ticks. Am Fam Physician. 1987;36:121-123.
  12. Perea AE, Hinckley AF, Mead PS. Tick bite prophylaxis: results from a 2012 survey of healthcare providers. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:388-392.
  13. Tick bites/prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/tickbornediseases/tick-bites-prevention.html. Revised January 10, 2019. Accessed September 17, 2019.
  14. Moncayo AC, Cohen SB, Fritzen CM, et al. Absence of Rickettsia rickettsii and occurrence of other spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks from Tennessee. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:653-657.
  15. Castellaw AH, Showers J, Goddard J, et al. Detection of vector-borne agents in lone star ticks, Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae), from Mississippi. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:473-476.
  16. Stromdahl EY, Vince MA, Billingsley PM, et al. Rickettsia amblyommii infecting Amblyomma americanum larvae. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:15-24.
  17. Long SW, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. Evaluation of transovarial transmission and transmissibility of Ehrlichia chaffeensis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2003;40:1000-1004.
References
  1. Sonenshine DE. Biology of Ticks. New York, NY: Oxford University; 1991.
  2. Alexander JOD. The effects of tick bites. In: Alexander JOD. Arthropods and Human Skin. London, England: Springer London; 1984:363-382.
  3. Duckworth PF Jr, Hayden GF, Reed CN. Human infestation by Amblyomma americanum larvae (“seed ticks”). South Med J. 1985;78:751-753.
  4. Parola P, Raoult D. Ticks and tickborne bacterial diseases in humans: an emerging infectious threat. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:897-928.
  5. Cropley TG. William Byrd on ticks, 1728. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:187.
  6. Goddard J. A ten-year study of tick biting in Mississippi: implications for human disease transmission. J Agromedicine. 2002;8:25-32.
  7. Goddard J, Portugal JS. Cutaneous lesions due to bites by larval Amblyomma americanum ticks. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1373-1375.
  8. Fibeger EA, Erickson QL, Weintraub BD, et al. Larval tick infestation: a case report and review of tick-borne disease. Cutis. 2008;82:38-46.
  9. Jones BE. Human ‘seed tick’ infestation: Amblyomma americanum larvae. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:812-814.
  10. Fisher EJ, Mo J, Lucky AW. Multiple pruritic papules from lone star tick larvae bites. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:491-494.
  11. Culp JS. Seed ticks. Am Fam Physician. 1987;36:121-123.
  12. Perea AE, Hinckley AF, Mead PS. Tick bite prophylaxis: results from a 2012 survey of healthcare providers. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:388-392.
  13. Tick bites/prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/tickbornediseases/tick-bites-prevention.html. Revised January 10, 2019. Accessed September 17, 2019.
  14. Moncayo AC, Cohen SB, Fritzen CM, et al. Absence of Rickettsia rickettsii and occurrence of other spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks from Tennessee. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:653-657.
  15. Castellaw AH, Showers J, Goddard J, et al. Detection of vector-borne agents in lone star ticks, Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae), from Mississippi. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:473-476.
  16. Stromdahl EY, Vince MA, Billingsley PM, et al. Rickettsia amblyommii infecting Amblyomma americanum larvae. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:15-24.
  17. Long SW, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. Evaluation of transovarial transmission and transmissibility of Ehrlichia chaffeensis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2003;40:1000-1004.
Issue
Cutis - 104(4)
Issue
Cutis - 104(4)
Page Number
E1-E3
Page Number
E1-E3
Publications
MDedge Dermatology
Cutis
Publications
MDedge Dermatology
Cutis
Topics
Infectious Diseases
Article Type
Article
Sections
Case Reports
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Larval (“seed”) ticks can attack in droves, causing a widespread rash consisting of pruritic erythematous papules and pustules.
  • Tiny black dots can be seen in some papules, which are the seed ticks themselves. Careful dermoscopic examination is critical to avoid easy misdiagnosis as hemorrhagic crust.
  • We encourage providers to include larval tick infestation in the differential for eruptive pruritic papules and pustules with a history of outdoor exposure, especially during the summer months.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Teaser Media
Article PDF Media