Reader Poll

Pregnant women in clinical trials: FDA questions how to include them


 

Gerald G. Briggs

Gerald G. Briggs

The draft guidance should take note of the fact that birth defects often don’t appear for months or even longer, according to Gerald Briggs, BPharm, FCCP, clinical professor of pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco. “Until first year of life or later, the babies need to be monitored,” he said in an interview.

Mr. Briggs, who led a 2015 report examining the role of pregnant women in phase 4 clinical drug trials, added that the document should take note of recommendations from clinical teratologists regarding the design of animal studies that should be performed prior to human trials (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):810-5).

Comments on the draft guidance can be made at www.federalregister.gov and are due by June 8, 2018.

Dr. Chambers and Mr. Briggs reported no relevant disclosures.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Antiviral shows early promise for treatment of Zika infection
MDedge Dermatology
CDC refocuses Zika testing recommendations in pregnancy
MDedge Dermatology
Zika’s 2017 summer less active than 2016
MDedge Dermatology
The race is on for a Zika vaccine
MDedge Dermatology
VIDEO: Biologic use during pregnancy had no impact on serious infection risks in infants
MDedge Dermatology
Zika-linked birth defects climbing in U.S. hot spots
MDedge Dermatology
USPSTF: Screen all pregnant women for syphilis
MDedge Dermatology
Get ready for certolizumab for psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves certolizumab label update for pregnancy, breastfeeding
MDedge Dermatology
MDedge Daily News: Why most heart failure may be preventable
MDedge Dermatology