From the Journals

Psoriasis therapy with biologics not linked to increased cancer risk


 

FROM THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY

Biologic treatments were not associated with an increased risk of cancer among patients with psoriasis in the medium term, in a study that analyzed data from patient registries.

“Cumulative length of exposure to biologics was not associated with the risk of developing cancers, even after controlling for the effect of age, gender, location,” as well as for previous exposure to methotrexate, cyclosporine, and phototherapy; duration of psoriasis; and comorbidities, reported Ignacio García-Doval, MD, of the Fundación Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, Madrid, and his associates.

Christine Langer-p?schel/Thinkstock
Data from four studies in Psonet from Israel, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom were analyzed, with each cancer case matched with up to four cancer-free controls in each cohort. Exposure to biologic therapies, methotrexate, and cyclosporine were calculated as cumulative years of exposure, as were other expected confounders such as duration of psoriasis, length of exposure to phototherapy, and the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index. There were data on 579 cancer cases and 2,671 matched controls; this included 41 cases of squamous cell carcinoma and 108 cases of basal cell carcinoma. Psonet is a surveillance network in Europe that is monitoring the longterm effectiveness and safety of systemic agents in patients with psoriasis.

The pooled adjusted odds ratio of cancer per year of biologic exposure was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.13), demonstrating no significantly increased risk of cancer per cumulative year of biologic exposure for psoriasis therapy, Dr. García-Doval and his associates reported in the study, published in the British Journal of Dermatology. This was true even when broken down within the registries for comparison, and when analyzed by type of cancers, such as squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.

A limitation of the study was inadequate power to detect and compare risk between individual biologics, they said. Also, “as our data describe limited follow-up and latencies, it is still possible that a risk after longer periods of exposure and latencies exists.”

Most of the authors had numerous financial disclosures related to pharmaceutical companies. Psonet was supported with funds from the European Association of Venereology and Dermatology and the Italian Drug Agency. Funding for the individual registries includes support from pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: García-Doval I et al. Br J Dermatol. 2018 May 3. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16715.

Recommended Reading

AbbVie, Samsung Bioepis settle suits with delayed U.S. entry for adalimumab biosimilar
MDedge Dermatology
New PsA questionnaire fails to beat existing early screening methods
MDedge Dermatology
How to avoid severe diarrhea from apremilast
MDedge Dermatology
Surgical excision essential in severe hidradenitis suppurativa
MDedge Dermatology
Is PASI 100 the new benchmark in psoriasis?
MDedge Dermatology
Psoriasis duration reflects cardiovascular event risk
MDedge Dermatology
Hidradenitis suppurativa packs mighty QOL impact
MDedge Dermatology
Secukinumab Emerges as a Rapidly Effective Therapy for Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris
MDedge Dermatology
Topical corticosteroid-retinoid combination effective in moderate to severe psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
CBC values linked to CVD risk in psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology