Case Reports

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as a First-Line Diagnostic Technique for Mycosis Fungoides

Author and Disclosure Information

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and is a diagnostic challenge in its early stages. It often can be misdiagnosed as chronic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, or other common dermatoses. Histologic diagnosis remains the gold standard for MF; however, in many cases repeat biopsies may be needed over time, especially in early patch stages of MF. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a quick and noninvasive diagnostic tool that may be useful to determine an appropriate area to biopsy. We present the case of a 60-year-old man with plaque and tumor lesions clinically suspicious for MF that had originally been misdiagnosed as psoriasis. Reflectance confocal microscopy was used to evaluate for findings specific to MF and to select an appropriate biopsy site. The features noted on RCM were consistent with MF, and subsequent biopsy revealed tumor-stage disease. This article describes a unique case in which RCM was used for initial primary diagnosis of tumor-stage MF in a clinical setting. As in prior studies, our evaluation failed to identify unique RCM features specific to tumor-stage MF when compared to plaque- or patch-stage disease. Nonetheless, RCM may be useful in providing a quick noninvasive diagnosis when the clinical presentation of MF is ambiguous, especially in early lesions.

Practice Points

  • Mycosis fungoides (MF) can be a challenging diagnosis to establish and often requires multiple biopsies.
  • Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) may be helpful as a bedside noninvasive diagnostic technique.
  • In suspected MF cases, RCM may assist in selecting the optimal biopsy site for better yield of histopathologic results.


 

References

Case Report

A 60-year-old man with a history of Hodgkin lymphoma that had been treated with chemotherapy 6 years prior presented to our dermatology clinic with a persistent pruritic rash on the back, abdomen, and bilateral arms and legs. The eruption initially began as localized discrete lesions on the lower back 1 year prior to the current presentation; at that time a diagnosis of psoriasis was made at an outside dermatology clinic, and treatment with mometasone furoate cream was initiated. Despite the patient’s compliance with this treatment, the lesions did not resolve and began spreading to the arms, legs, chest, and abdomen. His current medications included lisinopril, escitalopram, aspirin, and omeprazole.

On presentation to our clinic, physical examination revealed round, scaly, pink plaques and tumors of variable sizes (3–10 cm) distributed asymmetrically on the chest, back, abdomen, arms, and legs (Figure 1). The lesions were grouped in well-defined areas encompassing approximately 30% of the body surface area. No lymphadenopathy was appreciated. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) performed on one of the lesions revealed disarray of the epidermis with small, weakly refractile, round to oval cells scattered within the spinous layer and dermoepidermal junction (Figure 2). Additionally, these weakly refractile, round to oval cells also were seen in vesiclelike dark spaces, and hyporefractile basal cells were appreciated surrounding the dermal papillae. Mycosis fungoides (MF) was diagnosed following correlation of the RCM findings with the clinical picture.

Figure1

Figure 1. Mycosis fungoides with round, scaly, pink plaques of variable sizes ranging from 3 to 10 cm distributed asymmetrically on the back, flank, and arms (A and B).

Figure2

Figure 2. Reflectance confocal microscopy of the stratum spinosum revealed epidermal disarray with small, weakly refractile, round to oval cells (blue markings) scattered among keratinocytes in vesiclelike dark spaces (A). At the level of the dermoepidermal junction, there were more weakly refractile, dermal, papillary rings compared to normal skin, as well as more weakly refractile, round to oval cells in the epidermis and dermis (B).

A biopsy was performed, with pathologic examination confirming the diagnosis of tumor-stage MF. Parakeratosis with epidermotropism of lymphocytes was noted along the basal layer and into the spinous layer of the epidermis (Figure 3). Underlying the epidermis there was a dense mononuclear infiltrate and conspicuous eosinophils extending to the deeper reticular dermis. The infiltrating cells had cerebriform nuclei and large pale cytoplasm. On immunostaining, the lymphocytes were positive for CD3 and CD4, and negative for CD5, CD7, and CD8. The patient was referred to the oncology department for disease management. Staging workup including computed tomography, flow cytometry, and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement were consistent with tumor-stage MF (T3N0M0B0).

Figure3

Figure 3. Atypical enlarged lymphocytes in the epidermis with hyperchromatic irregular nuclei of cells (inset) as well as a dense infiltrate in the dermis (A)(H&E, original magnifications ×10 and ×50 [inset]). CD4 immunohistochemical staining revealed atypical lymphocytes with dermal and epidermal infiltration (B)(original magnification ×10).

Pages

Recommended Reading

Unusual Presentation of Ectopic Extramammary Paget Disease
MDedge Dermatology
Nevus count tied to BCC risk
MDedge Dermatology
New Guidelines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: What You Need to Know
MDedge Dermatology
Study pinpoints skin cancer risk factors after hematopoietic cell transplant
MDedge Dermatology
Registry data provide evidence that Mohs surgery remains underutilized
MDedge Dermatology
Extramammary Paget Disease: Making the Correct Diagnosis
MDedge Dermatology
Cutavirus shows no association with primary cutaneous lymphoma
MDedge Dermatology
Intravascular Involvement of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
MDedge Dermatology
HPV vaccine: New therapeutic option for SCC?
MDedge Dermatology
Clinical Pearl: Mohs Cantaloupe Analogy for the Dermatology Resident
MDedge Dermatology