Case Reports

Acute Hemorrhagic Edema of Infancy: Guide to Prevent Misdiagnosis

Author and Disclosure Information

We report the case of a 10-month-old previously healthy boy who presented with acute rash, edema, and low-grade fever in the setting of recent diarrhea. We differentiate between acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI) and Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP).

Practice Points

  • Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI) is an uncommon benign leukocytoclastic vasculitis of unknown precise pathophysiology that is thought be immune complex mediated.
  • Clinical history, physical examination, and histopathologic analysis combine to allow the important differentiation between AHEI and Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP).
  • Differentiation between AHEI and HSP determines treatment decisions and indicates the need for counseling on potential associated renal and gastrointestinal risks of HSP.


 

References

Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI) is an uncommon leukocytoclastic vasculitis affecting children aged 6 to 24 months; Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) is the most common misdiagnosis. The 2 entities should be differentiated, as HSP may have renal and gastrointestinal (GI) comorbidities that need serial follow-up, whereas AHEI follows a benign course without systemic sequelae. Patient history and physical examination are the most important factors in differentiating the 2 diseases; histopathologic and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) analyses may lend further diagnostic confidence.

We report the case of a 10-month-old previously healthy boy who presented with acute rash, edema, and low-grade fever in the setting of recent diarrhea. We differentiate between AHEI and HSP to help prevent misdiagnosis by health care providers.

Case Report

A 10-month-old previously healthy boy presented to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of a rash and swelling of 4 days’ duration. He had nonbloody diarrhea 1 week prior; soon after, he developed bilateral lower leg edema and rash. On evaluation in a different ED, he had a low-grade fever (rectal temperature, 38.0°C) but normal blood work, including complete blood cell count, basic metabolic panel, and coagulation studies. The patient was discharged to outpatient follow-up with his pediatrician who reported normal urinalysis.

Due to progression of the rash, the patient presented to our ED 3 days after his initial ED assessment. Dermatology was consulted. At the time of presentation, he was afebrile but with GI upset and fussiness. His parents denied additional symptoms or blood in urine or stool. Physical examination revealed a nontoxic-appearing infant with scattered palpable, annular, purpuric papules coalescing into plaques on both legs and feet (Figure 1), with sparse petechiae noted on the lower abdomen. The cheeks had scattered purpuric papules and plaques bilaterally, a few with a small central crust (Figure 2), and the right superior helix had a faint purpuric macule. The hands had a few pink edematous coalescing papules.

Figure1

Figure 1. Edematous, palpable, purpuric coalescing papules on the right leg.

Figure2

Figure 2. Purpuric papules and plaques on the face.

Histopathologic analyses with hematoxylin and eosin staining (Figure 3) and DIF (Figure 4) were performed from within a representative purpuric plaque on the right hip. Direct immunofluorescence was performed to evaluate for an IgA vasculitis versus an alternative type of vasculitis. The hematoxylin and eosin–stained specimen demonstrated a dermal perivascular infiltrate involving superficial and deep vessels with neutrophils, karyorrhexis, and erythrocyte extravasation. The endothelium was intact, with a mild suggestion of fibrinoid change of the blood vessel walls. Direct immunofluorescence revealed granular deposition of IgA, C3, and fibrinogen in multiple dermal blood vessels. Combined, the specimens were interpreted as evolving IgA-associated leukocytoclastic vasculitis.

Figure3

Figure 3. Evolving leukocytoclastic vasculitis on histopathology (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Figure4

Figure 4. Direct immunofluorescence with IgA granular deposition inmultiple dermal blood vessels.

The case was reviewed with our 2 department pediatric dermatologists; a diagnosis of AHEI was made based on the clinical and supportive histopathological presentations. The patient’s parents chose active treatment with a 2-week taper of oral prednisone because of the patient’s discomfort with edema. No GI or adverse renal sequelae, including findings on urinalysis, were reported at 1-month hospital follow-up with dermatology and pediatrics.

Pages

Recommended Reading

What is the Diagnosis - September 2018
MDedge Dermatology
Dupilumab positive in phase 3 study for treating adolescent atopic dermatitis
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves Seysara for treatment of moderate to severe acne
MDedge Dermatology
Adalimumab safety profile similar in children and adults
MDedge Dermatology
What is your diagnosis?
MDedge Dermatology
Pediatric Skin Care: Survey of the Cutis Editorial Board
MDedge Dermatology
Hemorrhagic Crusted Papule on the Arm
MDedge Dermatology
Pediatric Dermatology Workforce Shortage Explained
MDedge Dermatology
Acrokeratoelastoidosis and Knuckle Pads Coexisting in a Child
MDedge Dermatology
Hand-foot-and-mouth Disease Caused by Coxsackievirus A6 on the Rise
MDedge Dermatology