News

Congress Clarifies "Creditor" Definition for Red Flags Rule

A creditor is not someone who simply "advances funds on behalf of a person for expenses" related to a service.


 

Congress on Dec. 7 passed legislation clarifying its definition of a "creditor" under the Red Flags rule, a move that could help bolster the case that physicians should not have to abide by the new identity theft safeguards.

Physicians currently have until Dec. 31 before the Federal Trade Commission is set to begin enforcing the Red Flags rule. The rule was written to implement provisions of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, which calls on creditors and financial institutions to address the risk of identity theft. The rule requires creditors to develop formal identity theft–prevention programs that would allow an organization to identify, detect, and respond to any suspicious practices ("red flags") that could indicate identity theft. However, physician groups have long asserted that they are not creditors and should be exempt from the requirements, which they consider overly burdensome.

Under the new legislation (S. 3987), which was passed by the House on Dec. 7 and by the Senate on Nov. 30, Congress clarifies that a creditor is not someone who simply "advances funds on behalf of a person for expenses" related to a service. The American Medical Association and other physician groups are hopeful that the clarification will be enough to convince officials at the Federal Trade Commission to exempt physicians from the Red Flags rule.

"The AMA is pleased that this legislation supports AMA's long-standing argument to the FTC that physicians are not creditors. This bill will help eliminate the current confusion about the rule's application to physicians," AMA President Cecil B. Wilson said in a statement issued on Dec. 7. "We hope that the FTC will now withdraw its assertion that the red flags rule applies to physicians."

The Red Flags rule became effective on Jan. 1, 2008, with an original enforcement deadline of Nov. 1, 2008. However, the FTC has delayed enforcement of the rule five times, first to give organizations more time to become familiar with the requirements, and later at the request of members of Congress. The most recent enforcement delay is set to expire on Dec. 31.

In May 2010, the AMA joined the American Osteopathic Association and the Medical Society of the District Columbia in a federal lawsuit that seeks to prevent the FTC from applying the Red Flags rule to physicians.

Recommended Reading

Medicare's Berwick Makes First Appearance on the Hill
MDedge Dermatology
Senate Passes Short-Term SGR Fix
MDedge Dermatology
Insurers to Pay 80%-85% of Premium for Care
MDedge Dermatology
National Committee Seeks Comment on Accountable Care Draft Criteria
MDedge Dermatology
Commentary: Well-Intentioned FDA Rule Misses the Mark
MDedge Dermatology
Act Now to Avoid Medicare E-Prescribing Penalty
MDedge Dermatology
International Dermatologic Surgery Exchange Fund Established
MDedge Dermatology
AAD Releases Updated Isotretinoin Position Statement
MDedge Dermatology
House Passes Short-Term SGR Fix
MDedge Dermatology
Groups Unite to Issue Accountable Care Organization Principles
MDedge Dermatology