Residency Roundup

Differences in Underrepresented in Medicine Applicant Backgrounds and Outcomes in the 2020-2021 Dermatology Residency Match

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Underrepresented in medicine applicants were more likely to complete a research gap year (eTable). Most applicants who took research years did so to improve their chances of matching, regardless of their race/ethnicity. For those who did not complete a research year, Black applicants (46.7%) were more likely to base that decision on financial limitations compared to non-UIMs (18.6%, P<.0001). Interestingly, in the PD survey, only 4.5% of respondents considered completion of a research year extremely or very important when compiling rank lists.

Applicant Characteristics

Application Process and Match Outcomes—The Table highlights differences in how UIM applicants approached the application process. Black but not Latinx applicants were less likely to be first-time applicants to dermatology compared to non-UIM applicants. Black applicants (8.3%) were significantly less likely to apply to more than 100 programs compared to non-UIM applicants (29.5%, P=.0002). Underrepresented in medicine applicants received greater numbers of interviews despite applying to fewer programs overall.

Match Outcomes

There also were differences in how UIM candidates approached their rank lists, with Black and Latinx applicants prioritizing diversity of patient populations and program faculty as well as program missions and values (Figure).

Factors dermatology residency applicants considered when compiling rank lists

Factors dermatology residency applicants considered when compiling rank lists (non-UIM applicants, n=156; Latinx applicants, n=16; Black applicants, n=23). UIM indicates underrepresented in medicine.

In our cohort, UIM candidates were more likely than non-UIM to match, and Black applicants were most likely to match at one of their top 3 choices (Table). In the PD survey, 77.6% of PDs considered contribution to diversity an important factor when compiling their rank lists.

Comment

Applicant Background—Dermatology is a competitive specialty with a challenging application process2 that has been further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study elucidated how the 2020-2021 application cycle affected UIM dermatology applicants. Prior studies have found that UIM medical students were more likely to come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds; financial constraints pose a major barrier for UIM and low-income students interested in dermatology.4-6 We found this to be true in our cohort, as Black and Latinx applicants were significantly more likely to come from disadvantaged backgrounds (P<.000008 and P=.006, respectively). Additionally, we found that Black applicants were more likely than any other group to indicate financial concerns as their primary reason for not taking a research gap year.

Recommended Reading

Assessing Treatment Delays for Vitiligo Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review
MDedge Dermatology
Basal Cell Carcinoma
MDedge Dermatology
LGBTQ students would get new protections under Biden plan
MDedge Dermatology
Alabama cites Roe decision in call to ban transgender health care
MDedge Dermatology
Doc releases song after racist massacre in Buffalo
MDedge Dermatology
Study eyes characteristics of pediatric patients with hidradenitis suppurativa
MDedge Dermatology
Ten steps for clinicians to avoid being racist: The Francis commitment
MDedge Dermatology
Cultural humility required to optimize treatment of eczema patients with skin of color
MDedge Dermatology
Perceptions of Community Service in Dermatology Residency Training Programs: A Survey-Based Study of Program Directors, Residents, and Recent Dermatology Residency Graduates
MDedge Dermatology
Pigmented Papules on the Face, Neck, and Chest
MDedge Dermatology