Original Research

Rituximab Treatment and Improvement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Pemphigus

Cutis. 2023 January;111(1):53-56,E1-E4 | doi:10.12788/cutis.0684

References

Hammers CM, Stanley JR. Mechanisms of disease: pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid. Ann Rev Pathol. 2016;11:175-197.
Kasperkiewicz M, Ellebrecht CT, Takahashi H, et al. Pemphigus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17026.
Mayrshofer F, Hertl M, Sinkgraven R, et al. Significant decrease in quality of life in patients with pemphigus vulgaris, result from the German Bullous Skin Disease (BSD) Study Group. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005;3:431-435.
Terrab Z, Benckikhi H, Maaroufi A, et al. Quality of life and pemphigus. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2005;132:321-328.
Tabolli S, Mozzetta A, Antinone V, et al. The health impact of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form health survey questionnaire. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:1029-1034.
Paradisi A, Sampogna F, Di Pietro, C, et al. Quality-of-life assessment in patients with pemphigus using a minimum set of evaluation tools. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:261-269.
Heelan K, Hitzig SL, Knowles S, et al. Loss of work productivity and quality of life in patients with autoimmune bullous dermatoses. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19:546-554.
Ghodsi SZ, Chams-Davatchi C, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Quality of life and psychological status of patients with pemphigus vulgaris using Dermatology Life Quality Index and General Health Questionnaires. J Dermatol. 2012;39:141-144.
Schäcke H, Döcke WD, Asadullah K. Mechanisms involved in the side effects of glucocorticoids. Pharmacol Ther. 2002;96:2343.
Mohammad-Javad N, Parvaneh H, Maryam G, et al. Randomized trial of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment versus triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste in the treatment of oral pemphigus vulgaris. Iranian J Dermatol. 2012;15:42-46.
Lunardon L, Tsai KJ, Propert KJ, et al. Adjuvant rituximab therapy of pemphigus: a single-center experience with 31 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148:1031-1036.
Colliou N, Picard D, Caillot F, et al. Long-term remissions of severe pemphigus after rituximab therapy are associated with prolonged failure of desmoglein B cell response. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:175ra30.
Heelan K, Al-Mohammedi F, Smith MJ, et al. Durable remission of pemphigus with a fixed-dose rituximab protocol. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:703-708.
Joly P, Maho-Vaillant M, Prost-Squarcioni C, et al. First-line rituximab combined with short-term prednisone versus prednisone alone for the treatment of pemphigus (Ritux3): a prospective, multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2031-2040
Aryanian Z, Balighi K, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Rituximab exhibits a better safety profile when used as a first line of treatment for pemphigus vulgaris: a retrospective study. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;96:107755.
Aghai S, Sodaifi M, Jafari P, et al. DLQI scores in vitiligo: reliability and validity of the Persian version. BMC Dermatol. 2004;4:8.
Schünemann HJ, Akl EA, Guyatt GH. Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: the clinician’s perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:62.
Quality of life questionnaires. Cardiff University website. Accessed December 16, 2022. http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/dermatology/quality-oflife/dermatology-quality-of-life-index-dlqi/dlqi-instructions-foruse-and-scoring/
Kanwar AJ, Tsuruta D, Vinay K, et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in Indian pemphigus patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:E17-E23.
Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Cosnes A, et al. First-line treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with a combination of rituximab and high-potency topical corticosteroids. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:200-203.
Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:210-216.
Aghaei S, Moradi A, Ardekani GS. Impact of psoriasis on quality of life in Iran. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75:220.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). 1. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.

The SF-36 is a widely used 36-item questionnaire measuring functional health and well-being across 8 domains—mental health, pain, physical function, role emotional, role physical, social functioning, vitality, and general health perception—with scores for each ranging from 0 to 100. The physical component scores (PCSs) and mental component scores (MCSs) were derived from these 8 subscales, each ranging from 0 to 400, with higher scores indicating better health status.⁶

The DLQI, one of the most frequently used QOL measures in dermatology, contains 10 questions, each referring to the prior week and classified in the following 6 subscales: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, personal relationships, work and school, and treatment.¹⁶ The total score ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (very high impact), with a higher score indicating a lower QOL (eTable 1). The minimal clinically important difference (MCD) for the DLQI was considered to be 2- to 5-point changes in prior studies.^17,18 In this study, we used an MCD of a 5-point change or more between study groups.

Moreover, the patient general assessment (PGA) of disease severity was identified using a 3-point scale (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 23. P≤.05 was considered significant. Mean and SD were calculated for descriptive data. The t test, Fisher exact test, analysis of variance, multiple regression analysis, and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the relationship between variables.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

A total of 96 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean (SD) age of participants was 41.42 (15.1) years (range, 18–58 years). Of 96 patients whose data were included, 55 (57.29%) patients had received RTX 3 months earlier (3M group) and 41 (42.71%) received RTX in the last 2 weeks (R group). A summary of study patient characteristics in each group is provided in eTable 2. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, type of pemphigus, marital status, education, positive Nikolsky sign, smoking status, existence of comorbidities, site of lesions, and RTX treatment protocol. However, a significant difference was found for duration of disease (P=.0124) and mean prednisolone dosage (P=.001) as well as severity of disease measured by PDAI score (P=.003) and anti-DSG1 (P=.003) and anti-DSG3 (P=.021) values.

Patient-Reported Outcomes

Physical and mental component scores are summarized in eTable 3. Generally, SF-36 scores were improved with RTX treatment in all dimensions except for mental health, though these differences were not statistically significant, with the greatest mean improvement in the role physical index (75.45 in the 3M group vs 53.04 in the R group; P=.009). Mean SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were higher in the 3M group vs the R group, though the difference in MCS score did not reach the level of significance (eTable 3).

Mean DLQI scores in the R and 3M groups were 12.31 and 6.96, respectively, indicating a considerable burden on HRQOL in both groups. However, a statistically significant difference between these values was seen that also was clinically meaningful, indicating a significant improvement of QOL in patients receiving RTX 3 months earlier (P=.005)(eTable 3).