Original Research

The Impact of Primary Tumor Site on Survival in Mycosis Fungoides

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Similar to MF originating in the head and neck region, the upper limb as a primary tumor site initially was found to be a significant predictor of both OS and DSS on univariate analysis but not on multivariate analysis. By contrast, Su et al18 found survival outcomes were worse for patients diagnosed with MF with the upper limb as the primary tumor site compared with the lower limb on multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis but not on pairwise propensity score matching. The difference in our results compared with Su et al18 may be because the National Cancer Database only reports OS, while DSS may be more useful in determining prognostic factors associated with poorer survival, especially in an older patient population with greater comorbidities. Furthermore, the nonsignificance of the upper limb as a primary tumor site on further multivariate analysis may be due to similar reasonings as for the head and neck, including more advanced T staging and an anatomic location close to lymph nodes.

Study Limitations—The SEER database is a national registry, which lends itself to potential data heterogeneity in recording and miscoding. Additionally, there may be higher rates of unconfirmed or missing information given the retrospective nature of the SEER database; the database also does not delineate facility type, insurance status, or Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index as demographic factors, which could influence the multivariable analysis. Finally, the SEER database does not further demarcate subtypes of MF, such as the aggressive folliculotropic variant commonly seen in head and neck MF lesions, which precludes independent analysis of disease course by subtype.

Conclusion

Our study evaluated primary disease site as a prognostic factor for OS and DSS in patients with MF. Although head and neck and upper limb as primary disease sites were found to be significant on univariate analysis, they were found to be an insignificant prognostic variable for OS or DSS in our multivariable analysis, potentially due to the aggressive nature of advanced-stage MF and localization close to lymph nodes. Further research including a deeper dive into MF of all stages and subtypes is needed to fully investigate primary disease site as a prognostic indicator. Older age, larger tumor size, a higher T stage, lymph node involvement, and presence of metastasis were associated with worse DSS, and patients with these attributes should be counseled regarding expected disease course and prognosis.

Pages

Recommended Reading

How to Optimize Epidermal Approximation During Wound Suturing Using a Smartphone Camera
MDedge Dermatology
Does Exercise Reduce Cancer Risk? It’s Just Not That Simple
MDedge Dermatology
ASTRO Pushes Return to Direct Supervision in RT: Needed or ‘Babysitting’?
MDedge Dermatology
Rare Cutaneous Presentation of Burkitt Lymphoma
MDedge Dermatology
Most Cancer Trial Centers Located Closer to White, Affluent Populations
MDedge Dermatology
AI in Clinical Dermatology: Consider Limitations, Current Issues
MDedge Dermatology
Few Childhood Cancer Survivors Get Recommended Screenings
MDedge Dermatology
Florida Legislature Passes Free Skin Cancer Screening Requirement
MDedge Dermatology
Should Opioids Be Used for Chronic Cancer Pain?
MDedge Dermatology
Virtual Reality Brings Relief to Hospitalized Patients With Cancer
MDedge Dermatology