From the Journals

ASTRO Releases New EBRT Guideline for Symptomatic Bone Mets


 

FROM PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY

Techniques, Dose-Fractionation, and Dose-Constraints for Palliative Reirradiation

For patients with spinal bone metastases requiring reirradiation to the same site, the strongly recommended conventional palliative RT regimens are 800 cGy in 1 fraction, 2000 cGy in 5 fractions, 2400 cGy in 6 fractions, or 2000 cGy in 8 fractions. When determining the RT dose-fractionation, consider the prior RT dose, time interval, and total spinal cord tolerance, the guideline says.

Treatment with SBRT is conditionally recommended for patients with spinal bone metastases needing reirradiation at the same site. When determining if SBRT is appropriate, consider patient factors such as urgency of treatment, prognosis, and radio-resistance. In addition, consider the prior RT dose, time interval, and total spinal cord tolerance when determining the RT dose-fractionation, the authors say.

The strongly recommended options for patients with symptomatic non-spine bone metastases needing reirradiation at the same site are single-fraction RT (800 cGy in 1 fraction) or multifraction conventional palliative RT (2000 cGy in 5 fractions or 2400 cGy in 6 fractions).

Impact of Techniques and Dose-fractionation on Quality of Life and Toxicity

For patients with bone metastases undergoing palliative radiation, it is strongly recommended to use a shared decision-making approach to determine the dose, fractionation, and supportive measures to optimize quality of life.

“Based on published data, the ASTRO task force’s recommendations inform best clinical practices on palliative RT for symptomatic bone metastases,” the guideline panelists said.

Limitations

While the guideline provides comprehensive recommendations, the panelists underscored the importance of individualized treatment approaches. Future research is needed to address gaps in evidence, particularly regarding advanced RT techniques and reirradiation strategies.

Guideline development was funded by ASTRO, with the systematic evidence review funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The panelists disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, Elekta, Teladoc, and others.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Do Health-Related Social Needs Raise Mortality Risk in Cancer Survivors?
MDedge Dermatology
Do Patients Benefit from Cancer Trial Participation?
MDedge Dermatology
Can a Risk Score Predict Kidney Injury After Cisplatin?
MDedge Dermatology
New mRNA Vaccines in Development for Cancer and Infections
MDedge Dermatology
Darker Skin Tones Underrepresented on Skin Cancer Education Websites
MDedge Dermatology
Survey Spotlights Identification of Dermatologic Adverse Events From Cancer Therapies
MDedge Dermatology
Chatbots Seem More Empathetic Than Docs in Cancer Discussions
MDedge Dermatology
Urine Tests Could Be ‘Enormous Step’ in Diagnosing Cancer
MDedge Dermatology
Does More Systemic Treatment for Advanced Cancer Improve Survival?
MDedge Dermatology
Obesity and Cancer: Untangling a Complex Web
MDedge Dermatology