From the Journals

Hypnosis May Offer Relief During Sharp Debridement of Skin Ulcers


 

TOPLINE:

Hypnosis reduces pain during sharp debridement of skin ulcers in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, with most patients reporting decreased pain awareness and lasting pain relief for 2-3 days after the procedure.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Researchers reported their experience with the anecdotal use of hypnosis for pain management in debridement of skin ulcers in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
  • They studied 16 participants (14 women; mean age, 56 years; 14 with systemic sclerosis or morphea) with recurrent skin ulcerations requiring sharp debridement, who presented to a wound care clinic at the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom. The participants had negative experiences with pharmacologic pain management.
  • Participants consented to hypnosis during debridement as the only mode of analgesia, conducted by the same hypnosis-trained, experienced healthcare professional in charge of their ulcer care.
  • Ulcer pain scores were recorded using a numerical rating pain scale before and immediately after debridement, with a score of 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Hypnosis reduced the median pre-debridement ulcer pain score from 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-10) to 0.5 (IQR, 0-2) immediately after the procedure.
  • Of 16 participants, 14 reported being aware of the procedure but not feeling the pain, with only two participants experiencing a brief spike in pain.
  • The other two participants reported experiencing reduced awareness and being pain-free during the procedure.
  • Five participants reported a lasting decrease in pain perception for 2-3 days after the procedure.

IN PRACTICE:

“These preliminary data underscore the potential for the integration of hypnosis into the management of intervention-related pain in clinical care,” the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

The study was led by Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, PhD, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, the University of Leeds, and Chapel Allerton Hospital in Leeds, United Kingdom. It was published as a correspondence on September 10, 2024, in The Lancet Rheumatology.

LIMITATIONS:

The small sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings. The methods used for data collection were not standardized, and the individuals included in the study may have introduced selection bias.

DISCLOSURES:

The study did not have a funding source. The authors declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Future of Lupus Treatments Looks Brighter With Multiple Promising Therapeutic Approaches
MDedge Dermatology
Air Pollution and Genetics May Raise Risk for Lupus
MDedge Dermatology
Psychiatric, Autoimmune Comorbidities Increased in Patients with Alopecia Areata
MDedge Dermatology
When Does Different Types of Organ Damage From Lupus Occur? Long-Term Study Sheds Light
MDedge Dermatology
Fillers, Hyaluronidase Relieve Orofacial Changes in Patients with Scleroderma
MDedge Dermatology
Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases, Type 2 Diabetes Reap GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Benefits, Too
MDedge Dermatology
Systemic Sclerosis Without Scleroderma Has Unique Severity, Prognosis
MDedge Dermatology
What’s Causing Raynaud Phenomenon Severity to Rise With High Temperatures?
MDedge Dermatology
Current Hydroxychloroquine Use in Lupus May Provide Protection Against Cardiovascular Events
MDedge Dermatology
Belimumab Hits Newer Remission, Low Disease Activity Metrics
MDedge Dermatology