LAS VEGAS – Traditional techniques for anchoring cartilage grafts after Mohs surgery on the nose might be more complicated than necessary.
Well-known textbook descriptions of cartilage grafting for alar rim reconstruction involve harvesting a large piece of cartilage and securing the grafted cartilage with multiple sutures medially to the lower lateral cartilage and laterally to the periosteum of the piriform aperture of the maxilla.
This technique is appropriate for large defects that require reconstruction of the entire alar subunit, but is unnecessary for many of the smaller alar defects that commonly are encountered in Mohs surgery, Dr. Ravi S. Krishnan said.
"While this does produce nice results, I don't like it for two reasons," he said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery. "It requires a very large cartilage graft, and it often requires more effort than you sometimes need."
In his approach to performing a cartilage graft with a skin graft on top of it, he starts the conventional way by making some stab incisions on either side of the wound to create a pocket for the cartilage graft. What most surgeons would do next is to place either a figure-of-eight suture or some interrupted sutures to hold the graft in place.
"While these techniques are fine, I sometimes still have problems with them getting the cartilage graft flush against the alar remnant," noted Dr. Krishnan of Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle.
Instead, he starts suturing from inside the nose, pushing the suture through the nose behind the cartilage graft, then pulling it back through the cartilage graft and the nose, finally pulling inferiorly as the knot is tied. He repeats this process, so that there are two sutures anchoring the cartilage graft along the alar rim. These sutures are left in place for 2 weeks to allow some fibrosis to occur.
"The reason I like this technique is because it pulls the graft inferiorly so that it's perfectly flush against the alar rim remnant," he said. It also leaves more of the wound base exposed so that any overlying skin graft will be well perfused.
This is not necessarily a new technique, Dr. Krishnan said, but he could find no published description of it. It doesn't necessarily give better results, but it's easier to execute than are traditional methods, he added.
His techniques for anchoring cartilage grafts along the alar rim also work well with flaps including nasolabial transposition flaps, bilobed flaps, and interpolated paranasal flaps, resulting in good contour and symmetry and very acceptable results, he believes.
He typically follows these patients for 6 months after surgery, and while it's possible that the cartilage graft could shift after 6 months, "I doubt this would be the case."
One small drawback is that epithelium can start growing over the anchoring sutures during the 2 weeks that they are left in place, making them difficult to remove.
"Some people worry about infection, but I've never seen an infection with this technique," he added. All patients in his practice that receive cartilage grafts get perioperative antibiotics.
The advantages outweigh any potential drawbacks of the technique, in his opinion. It's easy to perform, and results are at least as good as those with more difficult techniques. His method precisely places the cartilage "exactly where you want it" along the alar rim, and apposes the cartilage graft to the mucosal lining, he said. When used in conjunction with a full-thickness skin graft, it allows the skin graft to come into contact with as much of the base of the wound as possible.
"It is important to remember that this technique is applicable only to smaller alar defects," he said. "For larger alar defects, using a large cartilage graft secured in the traditional manner is the preferred approach."
Dr. Krishnan said he has no relevant financial disclosures.