Article

Teledermatology: An Intraobserver Diagnostic Correlation Study, Part II

Author and Disclosure Information

This is part II of an intraobserver diagnostic correlation study comparing teledermatology with traditional face-to-face evaluation. Part I discussed the methodology and diagnostic correlation results between teledermatology and in-person consultation (Cutis®. 2003;71:399-403). This second part reports the diagnostic certainty level between the 2 groups, which are shown to be significantly different (teledermatology, 7/10; in-person, 9/10). This difference held true in every category of skin condition evaluated (P≤.0065). Unlike other studies, we found that teledermatologists recommended biopsies 10% more frequently than clinic-based evaluators. We discuss the reasons for the lower diagnostic certainty level of teledermatologists, as well as the limitations of this study. Despite the limitations, we conclude that teledermatology appears to be an effective method of delivering dermatologic care in the appropriate setting.


 

Recommended Reading

Topical Therapy for Actinic Keratoses, I: 5-Fluorouracil and Imiquimod
MDedge Dermatology
Topical Therapy for Actinic Keratoses, II: Diclofenac, Colchicine, and Retinoids
MDedge Dermatology
Nature of the Beast [editorial]
MDedge Dermatology
Supernumerary Nipples: An Overview
MDedge Dermatology
Botanical Briefs: Tulips—Tulipa Species L.
MDedge Dermatology
What Is Your Diagnosis? Exostoses
MDedge Dermatology
Lasers, Light, and Acne
MDedge Dermatology
Treatment of Telangiectasia Macularis Eruptiva Perstans With Total Skin Electron Beam Radiation
MDedge Dermatology
Actinic Keratoses—Surgical and Physical Therapeutic Modalities
MDedge Dermatology
Treatment of Molluscum Contagiosum With the Pulsed Dye Laser Over a 28-Month Period
MDedge Dermatology