News

Less-frequent antibiotics as effective as daily vancomycin for skin infections

View on the News

Two antibiotics could have a major impact on the treatment of acute skin infections

While neither oritavancin nor dalbavancin is more efficacious than vancomycin is, they are easier to administer and "make it possible to treat patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections who might otherwise require hospitalization" as outpatients, "without compromising efficacy and without the need for laboratory monitoring or an indwelling intravenous catheter," Dr. Henry Chambers wrote in an accompanying editorial. By reducing or eliminating hospitalization-related expenses and risks, "this approach could profoundly affect how these infections are managed," he added. However, he cautioned that broader clinical use is needed to determine the safety of these two agents, and it is unclear how effective they will be for other types of infections, noting that more clinical trials are needed to "define the safety and efficacy profile." (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:2238-39 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1405078]).

Dr. Chambers is professor of medicine, University of California, San Francisco, and is chief of the division of infectious diseases, San Francisco General Hospital. He disclosed having received personal fees from Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Theravance, and personal fees and other support from Trius outside of this submitted work.


 

Treatment with once-weekly dalbavancin and treatment with a one-time dose of oritavancin for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections had similar outcomes to conventional treatment with vancomycin, in studies reported in the June 5 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

In the noninferiority studies, the effects of treatment with the two long-acting intravenously administered antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were comparable to treatment with vancomycin, administered intravenously twice a day (followed by oral linezolid in the dalbavancin study).

Dr. G. Ralph Corey

Both dalbavancin, which was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and oritavancin, which is being reviewed by the FDA, are lipoglycopeptide antibiotics with activity against gram-positive bacteria. Because of their prolonged half-lives, oritavancin can be administered as a single dose and dalbavancin can be administered once a week. The authors of both studies referred to the substantial medical costs associated with the inpatient treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

In the randomized double-blind, international study of oritavancin, the SOLO I trial, patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (cellulitis, wound infections, or an abscess), thought to be caused by a gram-positive pathogen were treated with a single intravenous dose of 1,200 mg of oritavancin (475 patients) or intravenous vancomycin twice a day for 7-10 days (479), at a dose of 1g or 15 mg/kg of body weight. Their mean age was 45 years, almost 9% were aged 65 years or older, more than half were white men, and about 34% were obese. Almost 20% had diabetes, and of the approximately 60% who had a pathogen isolated, almost all had a gram-positive pathogen known to cause acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections, with S. aureus being the most common.

The primary endpoint, evaluated early in treatment (48-72 hours after the drug was administered) was a composite of the following: cessation of spreading or a reduction in the baseline lesion size, absence of fever, and no need for rescue antibiotic to be administered. This endpoint was met by 82.3% of those on oritavancin and 78.9% of those on vancomycin, which met the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%, reported the authors, led by Dr. G. Ralph Corey, professor of medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC. (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:2180-90 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310422]).

These results were similar when analyzed by body mass index, whether the patient had diabetes or MRSA infection, and by race, sex, or type of lesion. The investigator-assessed clinical cure rates 7-14 days after treatment ended were about 80% in both groups, and the proportion of patients with at least a 20% reduction in the area of the lesion 48-72 hours after treatment started was 86.9% among those on oritavancin vs. 82.9% of those on vancomycin. More patients on oritavancin experienced nausea; otherwise, the proportion of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups.

While the study had limitations, a single-dose treatment for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections "that results in an early and sustained clinical response could have the potential to reduce the complications associated with multiple intravenous administrations in patients with these infections, improve adherence to treatment, improve quality of life, and reduce the utilization of health care resources," the authors concluded.

The dalbavancin studies, known as the Discover I and II studies, enrolled about 1,300 patients with cellulitis, a major abscess, or a wound infection; the median size of the infected area was 351cm2 in one study and 336 cm2 in the other. Patients were treated with dalbavancin (1g IV, followed by a 500 mg intravenous dose on day 8) or vancomycin (1 g or 15 mg/kg of body weight) every 12 hours for at least 3 days, with the option of changing to linezolid (600 mg) every 12 hours for a total of 10-14 days of treatment. Overall, 13% of the patients had diabetes, and more than 85% had a temperature over 38 degrees° C at baseline. The mean age was 49-50 years, almost 60% were male, almost 90% were white, and about half had systemic inflammatory response syndrome).

Dr. Helen Boucher

In a pooled analysis of the studies, 79.7% of those treated with dalbavancin and 79.8% of those treated with vancomycin-linezolid met the primary endpoint of an early clinical response (cessation of spread of infection-related erythema and absence of fever 48-72 hours after starting treatment).

The results were consistent at early and later time points, and results "were robust in patients with major abscess, cellulitis, or wound infection; in those with S. aureus, including MRSA, or Streptococcus pyogenes infection; and in those treated as an outpatient," reported the authors, led by Dr. Helen Boucher of Tufts University, Boston. (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:2169-79 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310480]).

Pages

Recommended Reading

CDC: Vaccines prevent millions of illnesses, but measles makes a return
MDedge Dermatology
Medications in Dermatology, Part 2: Immunosuppressives
MDedge Dermatology
Practice Question Answers: Medications in Dermatology, Part 2
MDedge Dermatology
Congenital Candidiasis: An Uncommon Skin Eruption Presenting at Birth
MDedge Dermatology
Cutaneous Alternariosis in a Renal Transplant Recipient
MDedge Dermatology
Buccal acyclovir delays recurrence of herpes labialis
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves dalbavancin for acute bacterial skin infections
MDedge Dermatology
What Is Your Diagnosis? Secondary Syphilis
MDedge Dermatology
Dermatology Coding Changes With ICD-10
MDedge Dermatology
Seven percent of patients with life-threatening skin reactions have another episode
MDedge Dermatology