Medicolegal Issues

Malpractice Counsel: Retained foreign body, ruptured esophagus

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Discussion

Esophageal perforation is a true medical emergency that requires timely diagnosis and management because morbidity and mortality are directly related to the time to treatment. Unfortunately, esophageal perforation can be a difficult diagnosis due to its relative rarity and variability in clinical presentation.

More than 50% of all esophageal perforations are iatrogenic, primarily as a complication of endoscopy.1 Other causes of perforation include spontaneous perforation or Boerhaave syndrome (15%), foreign body (12%), trauma (9%), and malignancy (1%).1 Anatomically, perforation tends to occur in the areas of the esophagus that are most narrow—eg, cricopharyngeus muscle, area of broncho-aortic constriction, and esophagogastric junction.1

Food impactions, not surprisingly, tend to occur in these same areas of the esophagus. In addition, there are structural esophageal abnormalities that increase the risk of food impaction, including diverticula, webs, rings, strictures, achalasia, and tumors.2 Since food impaction can result in an esophageal perforation, there is a significant overlap in the initial presentation of these two conditions. However, in cases of perforation, signs and symptoms of shock predominate as time progresses due to esophageal contents leaking into the mediastinal and pleural spaces.

Patients with a food impaction will often complain of an acute onset of dysphagia, difficulty in handling secretions, choking, drooling, retrosternal fullness, regurgitation of undigested food, and wheezing.2 Perforation can cause severe chest pain, tachypnea, dyspnea, fever, and shock.2

A chest X-ray is typically the initial imaging study for suspected esophageal perforation. Since most spontaneous perforations occur through the left posterolateral wall of the distal esophagus, a new left pleural effusion can frequently be seen on X-ray. Mediastinal emphysema is highly suspicious for perforation, but the condition takes time to develop; therefore, its absence on X-ray does not exclude perforation. In the setting of a normal chest X-ray and ongoing esophageal symptoms, further investigation is required, usually via CT scan or endoscopy. Computed tomography, because of its availability and speed, is usually the preferred study to confirm the diagnosis.

Once an esophageal perforation is confirmed or is highly suspected, the patient will require IV fluid resuscitation, IV broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, and emergency surgical consultation. As previously stated, esophageal perforation is associated with a high mortality rate, and time is critical to successful management.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Feds sue to block mega-mergers by health insurers
MDedge Emergency Medicine
CMS seeks input on future of Open Payments program
MDedge Emergency Medicine
FDA updates warning label for systemic fluoroquinolones
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Different approaches can combat negative online reviews
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Hemophilia guideline recommends integrated care model
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Skin rash in recent traveler? Think dengue fever
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Interhospital patient transfers must be standardized
MDedge Emergency Medicine
In septic shock, vasopressin not better than norepinephrine
MDedge Emergency Medicine
MCIs and the Orlando Nightclub Shooting
MDedge Emergency Medicine
First EDition: News for and about the practice of emergency medicine
MDedge Emergency Medicine