News

Exam-room posters cut inappropriate antibiotics prescriptions

View on the News

Will 'nudge' be sustainable?

Dr. Meeker and her colleagues have developed a novel intervention "based on a sophisticated understanding of how to overcome the psychology that drives behavior linked to inappropriate antibiotic prescription," and it required no complex algorithms, no special technology, no infrastructure, and no enforcement, observed Dr. Brad Spellberg.

"Rather than direct confrontation with the force of education or nagging, they sought a gentler ‘nudging’ approach that worked harmoniously with the underlying psychology of both patient and clinician," he noted.

It remains to be seen whether "this gentle nudge approach" can be generalized to other clinical practices across the country, he added, and whether its effectiveness will be sustained over the long term.

Dr. Spellberg is in the division of general internal medicine at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute in Torrance, Calif. His work is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and he reported ties to Abbott, Adenium, aRigen, Cardeas, Cempra, GlaxoSmithKline, Meiji, Novan, Pfizer, and Synthetic Biologics. These comments were taken from his invited commentary accompanying Dr. Meeker’s report (JAMA Intern. Med. 2014 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14019]).


 

FROM JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE

The intervention, based on a psychological principle, was more effective at curtailing inappropriate prescription of antibiotics than are many others currently in use. Those others typically are based on a model holding that clinicians will change their behavior simply because it makes rational sense to do so, and they use techniques such as education, awareness training, electronic alerts or reminders, and financial incentives, the researchers explained.

"[Our] findings support an alternative model suggesting that clinicians are influenced by interpersonal factors within the context of patient care – in particular, a desire to remain consistent with a prior public commitment," Dr. Meeker and her associates said.

They added that their study was limited because it covered a relatively small geographic area, involved a small number of clinicians, and was of short duration. Moreover, even though the intervention succeeded in reducing inappropriate prescribing significantly, the rate of inappropriate prescribing still remained high among the study participants.

The National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Aging funded the study. Dr. Meeker and her associates reported no relevant financial conflicts of interest.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Antibiotics for sore throat? No shame allowed
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Referral approach promotes next-day ID consultation for cellulitis
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Crystalloid, colloid solutions found equivalent in hypovolemic shock
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Twelve percent of boomers are HCV-positive in ED screening study
MDedge Emergency Medicine
First EDition
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Temperature alone doesn’t rule out flu in the ED
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Passive leg raise may predict fluid responsiveness in sepsis
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Featured Article: A Pain in the Neck--Nontraumatic Causes of Neck Pain
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Sepsis resuscitation efforts help beyond 6 hours
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Fatal U.S. dengue fever case misdiagnosed as West Nile virus
MDedge Emergency Medicine