News

Denosumab's Bone Benefits Persist at 5 Years of Therapy


 

From the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists

SAN DIEGO – Bone density and fracture risk continued to improve from baseline in postmenopausal women taking denosumab for osteoporosis, based on data from a 2-year extension of the FREEDOM study in more than 4,000 women.

The original FREEDOM study (Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months) enrolled 7,808 postmenopausal women aged 60-80 years with osteoporosis to receive either a subcutaneous injection of denosumab (60 mg) or placebo along with daily calcium and vitamin D supplements every 6 months. All subjects had bone mineral density (BMD) T scores of less than −2.5 but not less than −4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip. At 36 months, denosumab was associated with reductions of 68% in vertebral fracture and 40% in hip fracture (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:756-65).

These results were the basis of the Food and Drug Administration's approval of denosumab in June 2010.

In the extension study, 2,343 patients from the original treatment group and 2,207 patients in the control group received the denosumab treatment for 2 years (as well as calcium and vitamin D), yielding follow-up data for up to 5 years of drug exposure, said Dr. Cesar Libanati at the meeting.

Women in the long-term group who received denosumab for 5 years showed significant BMD improvements from baseline, of 13.7% in the lumbar spine and 7.0% in the total hip. Women in crossover group showed significant BMD improvements from the start of the extension study, of 7.9% in the lumbar spine and 4.1% in the total hip.

Patients in the crossover group showed significant increase in BMD from the extension study baseline similar to those seen in the long-term patients during their first 2 years of denosumab use, noted Dr. Libanati, clinical research medical director at Amgen Pharmaceuticals, maker of denosumab (Prolia), in Newbury Park, Calif.

During years 4 and 5, the annualized yearly incidence of new vertebral fractures in the long-term patients was steady at 1.4%, compared with 1.1% at the end of the 3-year FREEDOM study. The yearly incidence in the crossover treatment group was 0.9% for their first 2 years of denosumab exposure, compared with 2.5% in the first 2 years of the FREEDOM study.

The yearly incidence of nonvertebral fractures in the long-term patients was 1.4% after 4 years and 1.1% after 5 years.

Denosumab remained well tolerated during the extension study. The adverse event profile was “similar in years 4 and 5 to that observed in the 3 years of the placebo-controlled FREEDOM study,” Dr. Libanati said. Long-term patients also maintained the reductions in bone turnover seen during the original FREEDOM study, he added.

Recommended Reading

Hip Fracture Rates Rose as Use of HT Waned
MDedge Endocrinology
Check BMD After 3 Months of Amenorrhea
MDedge Endocrinology
New Guidance Aids Osteoporosis Screening
MDedge Endocrinology
Denosumab Gains New Indication, for Bone Metastases
MDedge Endocrinology
Local Corticosteroids Slowed RA Hand Bone Loss
MDedge Endocrinology
Targeted Interventions Improve Hip Fracture Outcomes
MDedge Endocrinology
Nitroglycerin Ointment Strengthened Bone
MDedge Endocrinology
Zoledronic Acid Cuts Fractures at All Risk Levels
MDedge Endocrinology
Atypical Fractures Rare With Bisphosphonates
MDedge Endocrinology
Denosumab Curbs Fractures Equally at All Risk Levels
MDedge Endocrinology