1. American College of Radiology. Appropriateness criteria. American College of Radiology Web site. Available at: https://acsearch.acr.org/list . Accessed January 4, 2015.
2. American College of Radiology. About the ACR appropriateness criteria. American College of Radiology Web site. Available at: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria/About-AC . Accessed July 20, 2015.
3. Becker LA, Green LA, Beaufait D, et al. Use of CT scans for the investigation of headache: a report from ASPN, Part 1. J Fam Pract . 1993;37:129-134.
4. Sandrini G, Friberg L, Jänig W, et al. Neurophysiological tests and neuroimaging procedures in non-acute headache: guidelines and recommendations. Eur J Neurol . 2004;11:217-224.
5. Sempere AP, Porta-Etessam J, Medrano V, et al. Neuroimaging in the evaluation of patients with non-acute headache. Cephalalgia . 2005;25:30-35.
6. Gilbert JW, Johnson KM, Larkin GL, et al. Atraumatic headache in US emergency departments: recent trends in CT/MRI utilisation and factors associated with severe intracranial pathology. Emerg Med J . 2012;29:576-581.
7. Tsushima Y, Endo K. MR imaging in the evaluation of chronic or recurrent headache. Radiology . 2005;235:575-579.
8. Jordan JE, Ramirez GF, Bradley WG, et al. Economic and outcomes assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of headache. J Natl Med Assoc . 2000;92:573-578.
9. Mitchell CS, Osborn RE, Grosskreutz SR. Computed tomography in the headache patient: is routine evaluation really necessary? Headache . 1993;33:82-86.
10. Frishberg BM. The utility of neuroimaging in the evaluation of headache in patients with normal neurologic examinations. Neurology . 1994;44:1191-1197.
11. Osborn AG. Osborn’s Brain: Imaging, Pathology, and Anatomy . Salt Lake City, Utah: Amirsys Publishing; 2013.
12. Silberstein SD. Chronic daily headache. J Am Osteopath Assoc . 2005;105:23S-29S.
13. Douglas AC, Wippold FJ 2nd, Broderick DF, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Headache. J Am Coll Radiol . 2014;11:657-667.
14. Knopman DS, DeKosky ST, Cummings JL, et al. Practice parameter: diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology . 2001;56:1143-1153.
15. Wippold FJ 2nd, Brown DC, Broderick DF, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Dementia and Movement Disorders. J Am Coll Radiol . 2015;12:19-28.
16. Kantarci K, Jack CR Jr. Neuroimaging in Alzheimer disease: an evidence-based review. Neuroimaging Clin N Am . 2003;13:197-209.
17. Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, et al. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol . 2014;13:844-854.
18. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet . 1974;2:81-84.
19. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, et al. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med . 2000;343:100-105.
20. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet . 2001;357:1391-1396.
21. Davis PC, Drayer BP, Anderson RE, et al. Head trauma. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology . 2000;215 Suppl:507-524.
22. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw JM, et al. A prospective clusterrandomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments. CMAJ . 2010;182:1527-1532.
23. Smits M, Dippel DW, Nederkoorn PJ, et al. Minor head injury: CT-based strategies for management—a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology . 2010;254:532-540.
24. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA . 2005;294:1511-1518.
25. Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, et al. External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA . 2005;294:1519-1525.