Conference Coverage

PPI cuts GI events from low- and high-dose aspirin

View on the News

Clinicians underutilize PPIs for low-dose aspirin

The new analysis of COGENT provides important insights into patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. The data show that patients on low-dose aspirin do not have an increased risk of cardiovascular events, and that patients who take low-dose aspirin still face a significant risk for upper-gastrointestinal events. Patients taking low-dose aspirin have about the same rate of upper-GI events as patients on high-dose aspirin.

The issue of GI safety for patients on low-dose aspirin as part of dual-antiplatelet therapy has been long overshadowed by concern over a hypothetical interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. The issue has also been distorted by a false sense of security that when patients receive low-dose aspirin they do not require protection against GI events.

Treatment of patients taking low-dose aspirin with a PPI is underutilized. The confirmation this analysis provides, that PPI treatment gives GI protection without causing an excess of cardiovascular events, calls for a change in current practice when clinicians prescribe low-dose aspirin. I’m concerned by the apparent lack of enthusiasm by clinicians to prescribe PPIs to their patients on low-dose aspirin despite their significant risk for GI events. The real question is whether all patients on low-dose aspirin should receive a PPI long term or only the subgroup of patients with high risk for an upper-GI bleed.

Dr. Michael E. Farkouh is a cardiologist at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. He has no disclosures. He made these comments in an editorial that accompanied the published report (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 April 12;67[14]:1672-3).


 

AT ACC 2016

References

The only caveat Dr. Vaduganathan placed on PPI use was that the COGENT data addressed only 6 months of PPI use; the safety of longer-term use has not been studied. But “the trend is to use PPIs for as short a period as possible,” and the risk for adverse effects from PPI treatment on cardiovascular disease events is likely greatest during the first 6 months of PPI treatment, he noted. If PPI treatment needs to continue beyond 6 months, he suggested systematically reassessing the risk-benefit balance for individual patients from continued PPI treatment every 3 months.*

*Changes were made to this story on 4/20/2016.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Similarities seen in rate and rhythm control for postsurgical AF
MDedge Family Medicine
Early antiarrhythmic drugs boost survival in shock-refractory cardiac arrest
MDedge Family Medicine
Stem cells show heart failure benefits in phase II trial
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA approves first leadless pacemaker
MDedge Family Medicine
USPSTF updates guideline for preventive aspirin therapy
MDedge Family Medicine
Drug-eluting stent recipients can safely have surgery sooner
MDedge Family Medicine
Standard incubation can miss P. acnes in infective endocarditis
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: HOPE-3 bolsters primary prevention in intermediate-risk patients
MDedge Family Medicine
DANAMI 3-iPOST: No significant benefit with ischemic postconditioning after STEMI
MDedge Family Medicine
Ticagrelor cuts post-MI events in diabetes patients
MDedge Family Medicine