Q&A

Continuous use of oral contraceptives reduces bleeding

Author and Disclosure Information

  • BACKGROUND: Most clinicians in the US prescribe oral contraceptives that are given cyclically for 21 days, followed by 7 days of no therapy, to mimic natural cycling, signal the absence of pregnancy, protect against endometrial cancer, and prevent irregular bleeding. This randomized controlled trial compared continuous and cyclic contraceptives with respect to bleeding pattern and side effects.
  • POPULATION STUDIED: The investigators recruited 79 subjects at a university-affiliated research clinic. They excluded women who intended to become pregnant, were aged <18 years or >45 years, had standard contraindications for oral contraceptives, had hemoglobin <9 g/dL, or had a diagnosis of uterine infection or cervical dysplasia.
  • STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: After an initial 28-day run-in period, women were randomized to receive either 21-day cycles (with 7 days of placebo) or continuous treatment with a 20-μg ethinyl estradiol/100-μg levonorgestrel formulation for 1 year. Allocation was concealed, but after randomization, masking was limited due to differences in pill color.
  • OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome was the number of bleeding and spotting days; secondary outcomes were adherence to regimen, patient satisfaction, symptoms, and physiologic parameters such as weight and blood pressure. Cost and provider satisfaction were not addressed.
  • RESULTS: Study groups were similar after randomization, and the follow-up rate was >75%. Bleeding was significantly less in continuous users than in cyclic uses, with an average of 3 vs 10 days for cycles 1–3 and 0 vs 9 for cycles 10–12, respectively (all comparisons P<.001.) Spotting was significantly greater in continuous users in cycles 1–3 (median 6 vs 4 days, P<.001), but no difference was found by the end of the trial.


 

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

This study provides good evidence that continuous use of combination oral contraceptives for 1 year decreases bleeding without clinically important changes in blood pressure, weight, or hemoglobin when compared with cyclic users. Clinicians should consider offering this option to their patients, while continuing to look for evidence that addresses long-term sequelae, as well as patients of color or those with less than a college education.

Recommended Reading

Treating hot flushes without hormone replacement therapy
MDedge Family Medicine
Remote diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: 2 types of telecolposcopy compared with cervicography
MDedge Family Medicine
What nonhormonal therapies are effective for postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms?
MDedge Family Medicine
Is osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women effective?
MDedge Family Medicine
Breastfeeding reduces pain in neonates
MDedge Family Medicine
Transdermal progesterone ineffective for menopausal symptoms
MDedge Family Medicine
Metoclopramide reduces nausea from emergency contraception
MDedge Family Medicine
Gabapentin helpful for hot flushes in postmenopausal women
MDedge Family Medicine
Natural progesterone prevents preterm birth in high-risk pregnancies
MDedge Family Medicine
False-positive mammograms increase follow-up rates
MDedge Family Medicine