Law & Medicine

Duty vs. confidentiality


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. Some of the materials have been taken from earlier columns in Internal Medicine News. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Wa. 2016).

2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976).

3. Thompson v. County of Alameda, 167 Cal. Rptr. 70, 76 (1980).

4. Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(3):325-43.

5. AMA Code of Medical Ethics [2.24 (3), 2012-2013 ed].

6. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, 2017 ed. [3.2.1 Confidentiality].

Pages

Recommended Reading

U.S. House passes 20-week abortion ban
MDedge Family Medicine
Now missing in EHR charts: a good impression
MDedge Family Medicine
Flat-fee primary care helps fill niche for Texas’ uninsured
MDedge Family Medicine
Five takeaways from Congress’ failure to extend funding for children’s coverage
MDedge Family Medicine
MIPS: It’s time to get started
MDedge Family Medicine
House, Senate committees clear CHIP reauthorization
MDedge Family Medicine
Rectal temps in the nursery
MDedge Family Medicine
Death by meeting
MDedge Family Medicine
Whose nurse is she/he?
MDedge Family Medicine
Trump administration narrows contraceptive mandate
MDedge Family Medicine