Feature

ACOG, ACP voice ‘deep concern’ over potential Title X changes


 


If patients lose access to such services through Title X–funded facilities, they may not have another option within reasonable proximity, said Ms. Erickson. She added that options that exist for the population likely to be affected are often community health centers already operating under significant resource constraints.

Title X does not currently fund any abortion services.

Ms. Erickson said that it’s not currently clear whether any proposed changes or limitations would include proscriptions on discussing contraceptive methods. She and Dr. Lawrence said that neither ACP nor ACOG would anticipate initiating or joining litigation against the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services or the administration. On the telebriefing, each representative said that their organizations would need to know what form Title X changes might take, and then see what the nature of any lawsuits would be, before endorsing litigation.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Self-administered subcutaneous Depo-Provera ‘feasible and acceptable’
MDedge Family Medicine
Contraceptive use appears low in teen girls on teratogenic medications
MDedge Family Medicine
More savings available from generic oral contraceptives
MDedge Family Medicine
Greater gynecological but not medical risks with hysteroscopic sterilization
MDedge Family Medicine
Court: State cannot sue over religious exemption expansion
MDedge Family Medicine
MDedge Daily News: Stem cells may reverse premature menopause
MDedge Family Medicine
Efavirenz-based ART may hamper vaginal ring contraception
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA orders new restrictions on sale, distribution of Essure
MDedge Family Medicine
LARC uptake surged immediately after Trump’s election
MDedge Family Medicine
MDedge Daily News: How Trump’s election affected contraception
MDedge Family Medicine