PURLs

An alternative regimen to reduce risk of asthma exacerbations

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Patients in the ICS/LABA group were given budesonide 200 µg/formoterol 6 µg, 1 puff prn, and patients in the ICS plus as-needed SABA group were given budesonide 200 µg, 1 puff twice daily, and terbutaline 250 µg, 2 puffs prn. All patients received an asthma action plan that provided guidance on when to seek medical care if asthma worsened, as well as a log to note urgent medical visits and use of systemic corticosteroids. A subset of patients had adherence and dosing monitored by electronic inhaler usage monitors. Patients were seen at 0, 4, 16, 28, 40, and 52 weeks.

Outcomes. The primary outcome was the number of severe exacerbations per patient per year, defined as treatment with oral corticosteroids for ≥ 3 days or ED visit or hospital admission requiring systemic corticosteroids. Among the secondary outcomes were number of moderate and severe exacerbations per patient per year (defined as an unplanned medical visit: primary care, ED, hospital admission, and any duration of steroids); time to first severe exacerbation; assessment with the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5); adverse outcomes; and quantity of ICS used (analysis done only for the subset with electronic inhaler monitoring).

This study represents a compelling, real-world look at emerging asthma recommendations.

ACQ-5 takes the mean of 5 questions assessing asthma control in the previous week, with each question ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). The statistician was blinded to the primary outcome.

Results. The rate of severe exacerbations per patient per year was 0.119 in the as-needed ICS/LABA group vs 0.172 in the scheduled ICS plus as-needed SABA group (relative rate [RR] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–1.00). Time to first severe asthma exacerbation was longer in the as-needed ICS/LABA group (hazard ratio = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.91). The rate of moderate and severe exacerbations per patient per year was lower in the as-needed ICS/LABA group: 0.165 vs 0.237 (RR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51–0.95).

ACQ-5 scores were similar at all time points (mean difference = 0.07; 95% CI, –0.03 to 0.17). Adverse events were similar between groups (most commonly nasopharyngitis in both groups). Less ICS was used in the ICS/LABA group (difference = –126.5 µg per day; 95% CI, –171.0 to –81.9).

Continue to: WHAT'S NEW

Copyright © 2021. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon jfp07003090_methodology.pdf354.44 KB

Recommended Reading

Asthma-COPD overlap: Patients have high disease burden
MDedge Family Medicine
Antibiotic exposure in pregnancy linked to childhood asthma risk in study
MDedge Family Medicine
Hospitalizations for food anaphylaxis triple, but deaths down in United Kingdom
MDedge Family Medicine
Masks don’t affect oxygen saturation in people with asthma
MDedge Family Medicine
Frequent medication refills show some patients not achieving asthma control
MDedge Family Medicine
Asthma not an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19, hospitalization
MDedge Family Medicine
Peanut sublingual immunotherapy feasible and effective in toddlers
MDedge Family Medicine
Patients with asthma say most doctors don’t ask about cannabis use
MDedge Family Medicine
Mepolizumab reduced exacerbations in patients with asthma and atopy, depression comorbidities
MDedge Family Medicine
Novel agent shows promise against cat allergy
MDedge Family Medicine