From the Journals

Study points to best treatments for depression in primary care


 

FROM ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE

Psychotherapies unknown, but meta-analysis is still useful

Commenting on these findings, Neil Skolnik, MD, professor of family and community medicine at Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, said this is “an important study, confirming and extending the conclusions” of a systematic review published in 2016 as a Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians.

“Unfortunately, the authors did not specify what type of psychotherapy was studied in the meta-analysis, so we have to look elsewhere if we want to advise our patients on what type of psychotherapy to seek, since there are important differences between different types of therapy,” he said.

Still, he described the study as providing “helpful information for the practicing clinician, as it gives us solid information with which to engage and advise patients in a shared decision-making process for effective treatment of depression.”

“Some patients will choose psychotherapy, some will choose medications. They can make either choice with the confidence that both approaches are effective,” Dr. Skolnik elaborated. “In addition, if psychotherapy does not seem to be sufficiently helping we are on solid ground adding an antidepressant medication to psychotherapy, with this data showing that the combined treatment works better than psychotherapy alone.”

Dr. Cuijpers receives allowances for his memberships on the board of directors of Mind, Fonds Psychische Gezondheid, and Korrelatie, and for being chair of the PACO committee of the Raad voor Civiel-militaire Zorg en Onderzoek of the Dutch Ministry of Defense. He also serves as deputy editor of Depression and Anxiety and associate editor of Psychological Bulletin, and he receives royalties for books he has authored or coauthored. He received grants from the European Union, ZonMw, and PFGV. Another study author reported receiving personal fees from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, MSD, and Shionogi and a grant from Mitsubishi-Tanabe outside the submitted work. One author has received research and consultancy fees from INCiPiT (Italian Network for Paediatric Trials), CARIPLO Foundation, and Angelini Pharmam, while another reported receiving personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa Kirin, ASKA Pharmaceutical, and Toyota Motor Corporation outside the submitted work. The other authors and Dr. Skolnik reported no conflicts.

Pages

Recommended Reading

New digital ADHD intervention tools are emerging
MDedge Family Medicine
TIPP the scales in managing stress
MDedge Family Medicine
Suicide risk prediction tools fail people of color
MDedge Family Medicine
Support group for Asian Americans uses theater to cope with COVID
MDedge Family Medicine
ADHD in preschool kids: Adrenergic agonists may be a better fit
MDedge Family Medicine
Adulterants in street drugs could increase susceptibility to COVID
MDedge Family Medicine
Taking a drug holiday: Benefits and risks to children with ADHD
MDedge Family Medicine
Will COVID-19 result in more ADHD cases? A debate
MDedge Family Medicine
Assessing the cognitive nuances between ADHD and autism
MDedge Family Medicine
Late-breaking news on trajectory of ADHD remission headlines world conference
MDedge Family Medicine