PURLs

Is self-administered DMPA an answer to contraception access in the post-Roe era?

Author and Disclosure Information

Compared with provider-administered depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a prefilled formulation may offer patients improved access to effective contraception.

PRACTICE CHANGER

Consider prescribing self-administered subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for contraception instead of provider-administered DMPA. Self-­administration improves contraception continuation rates without notable increases in pregnancy or adverse effects.

STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION

A: Based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies.1

Kennedy CE, Yeh PT, Gaffield ML, et al. Self-administration of injectable contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001350. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001350


 

References

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 32-year-old woman with a history of migraine with aura presents to your office for contraception management. She works full-time, has 2 children, and has transportation barriers. She previously used injectable DMPA (administered every 3 months at a health care facility) and would like to restart it. However, because she had to reschedule her last appointment due to a lack of transportation, she missed her injection window and subsequently became pregnant with her second child. She would still prefer injectable DMPA over the other contraceptive options ­offered—etonogestrel implant, oral contraceptive, or intrauterine device (IUD)—given her migraine history. However, she’s concerned she may have difficulty coming to the office every 3 months for her injection. What alternative injectable option can you offer?

When not pregnant or seeking to become pregnant, women may spend a significant amount of their lives trying to avoid pregnancy, and almost all women use contraception at some point.2 During the childbearing years of 15 to 49, 65% of women report using contraception.2 Although DMPA is a safe and effective option, only 2% of women report using it for contraception.2

For patients who have migraine with aura, there are fewer contraception options because their risk for ischemic stroke is increased 2- to 4-fold if they use combined hormonal contraceptives in pill, patch, or vaginal ring form.3 Safe options for these patients include the copper IUD, levonorgestrel­-releasing intrauterine system, progestin implant, and DMPA injection.3

DMPA is a progestogen-only contraceptive approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to prevent pregnancy. It is available in an intramuscular formulation (DMPA-IM; 150 mg/mL every 13 weeks) and a subcutaneous formulation (DMPA-SC; 104 mg/0.65 mL every 12-14 weeks). DMPA-IM is administered by a health care provider and thus requires patients to present every 3 months for an injection. About 6% of ­DMPA-IM users have an unintended pregnancy in the first year due to inconsistent or incorrect use or late receipt of injection.4 DMPA-SC is produced as a prefilled needle that can be self-injected by patients.

Barriers to access are a growing concern. During the COVID-19 pandemic, one-third of women surveyed by the Guttmacher Institute (n = 2009) reported delaying or canceling a health care visit or having difficulty obtaining their contraception. Barriers to health care and contraception access were more common among Black and Hispanic women (vs White women), queer women (vs straight women), and low-income women (vs higher-income women).5

Following the overturning of Roe v Wade in June 2022, abortion access is now limited in parts of the United States. Given this significant policy change, physicians have an increasingly important role in providing contraception care and reducing barriers to contraception access. Since the SC forms of injectable contraception can be administered at home rather than in the health care setting, both the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended that self-administered injectable contraception be made widely available to expand access to contraception.6,7

STUDY SUMMARY

Higher contraceptive continuation rates with comparable safety and efficacy

This 2019 systematic review and meta-­analysis evaluated the outcomes associated with use of self-administered DMPA-SC vs provider-administered DMPA in 5 countries.1 The authors searched several electronic databases for peer-reviewed studies of women who chose the option to self-administer DMPA-SC vs those who received DMPA injections from a health care provider.

Continue to: Outcomes included pregnancy

Pages

Copyright © 2023. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon jfp07203084_methodology.pdf225.3 KB

Recommended Reading

Who’s at higher risk for breast cancer recurrence?
MDedge Family Medicine
U.S. vs. French guidelines for osteoporosis treatment
MDedge Family Medicine
Ovarian cancer risk lower with daily aspirin, despite genetics
MDedge Family Medicine
What impact do carbs have on bone health?
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA expands abemaciclib use in high-risk early breast cancer
MDedge Family Medicine
HER2-low breast cancer is not a separate clinical entity: Study
MDedge Family Medicine
Breast cancer surgery timing matters, but is faster always better?
MDedge Family Medicine
For young people on Medicare, a hysterectomy sometimes is more affordable than birth control
MDedge Family Medicine
Black women have higher state-level rates of TNBC
MDedge Family Medicine
Midwife-led care linked to positive outcomes across medical risk levels
MDedge Family Medicine