PURLs

A new standard for treatment of torus fractures of the wrist?

Author and Disclosure Information

A large multicenter trial evaluated effects on pain and function for pediatric patients treated with a soft bandage vs rigid immobilization.

PRACTICE CHANGER

For uncomplicated pediatric torus fractures of the distal radius, consider definitive management with soft bandage immobilization until pain resolution, rather than rigid immobilization and clinical follow-up.

STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION

B: Based on a single randomized controlled trial with patient-oriented outcomes.1

Perry DC, Achten J, Knight R, et al; FORCE Collaborators in collaboration with PERUKI. Immobilisation of torus fractures of the wrist in children (FORCE): a randomised controlled equivalence trial in the UK. Lancet. 2022;400:39-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01015-7


 

References

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 9-year-old girl presents to your urgent care clinic after a fall while snowboarding for the first time. She reports falling forward onto her outstretched right hand and describes pain in her distal right forearm. She denies paresthesias, weakness, or lacerations. Physical examination reveals mild edema of the dorsal aspect of her distal right forearm and tenderness to palpation of the dorsal aspect of her distal radius. She denies tenderness to palpation of her ulna, anatomic snuffbox, hand, and elbow. Range of motion of the wrist is full on passive testing, but she declines active testing due to pain. Wrist radiographs reveal an uncomplicated torus fracture of the distal radius. Can immobilization with a soft bandage alone sufficiently treat this fracture?

Fractures of the distal radius are among the most common fractures of the upper extremity and commonly occur from a fall onto an outstretched hand.2 In the pediatric population, torus fractures, also known as buckle fractures, are the most common type of distal radius fracture, comprising an estimated 50% of pediatric wrist fractures.3,4 This is due to the presence of a physeal growth plate, thicker periosteum, and softer underlying bone in pediatric patients.4,5 When an axial load is applied, as in a fall onto an outstretched hand, the force can lead to plastic deformation, with or without cortical disruption of the bone.4,5

Pediatric torus fractures of the distal radius generally are treated with immobilization,2 traditionally through a short arm cast or a removable, rigid wrist splint.2,6 The wrist often is immobilized for 3 to 4 weeks, with routine follow-up and potential repeat plain film radiography to ensure stability.2,6

Despite common use of immobilization, torus fractures of the distal radius are anatomically stable, and displacement is unlikely to occur.7,8 As such, many studies have suggested that treatment of torus fractures with rigid immobilization in a cast or splint may not be necessary.9,10 However, a 2018 Cochrane review concluded that the quality of evidence illustrating similar recovery between treatments was low, leaving uncertainty as to the most appropriate management strategy.6 Less casting and follow-up imaging could have positive implications for patient satisfaction, health care–associated costs, and radiation exposure.10

This study, the Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial, compared the traditional treatment of distal radius torus fractures with rigid immobilization to soft immobilization and immediate discharge.

STUDY SUMMARY

Providing quality evidence for a standard of care

FORCE was a randomized controlled equivalence trial (N = 965) across 23 emergency departments (EDs) in the United Kingdom that compared pain and function in pediatric patients with distal radius torus fractures treated with a soft bandage and immediate discharge vs rigid immobilization and routine follow-up.1 Patients included children ages 4 to 15 years presenting to the ED with a distal radius torus fracture, which was confirmed radiologically.

At 3 days, pain scores improved by 3.2 points in the soft bandage group and 3.1 points in the rigid immobilization group.

Patients with concomitant ipsilateral ulnar fractures were included in the study. Researchers excluded patients with injuries older than 36 hours, evidence of cortical disruption on radiograph (eg, greenstick fracture), or additional fractures other than the wrist, or those who were deemed unable to follow up with the full study protocol (eg, having insufficient English comprehension).

Continue to: Patients were randomly assigned...

Pages

Copyright © 2023. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon jfp07211383_methodology.pdf139.86 KB

Recommended Reading

AAP: ‘Toddler milk’ unnecessary for most kids
MDedge Family Medicine
Massive databases unleash discovery, but not so much in the U.S.
MDedge Family Medicine
Semaglutide prescribing surged in the past year
MDedge Family Medicine
Survey finds oral minoxidil shortage in Washington-area pharmacies
MDedge Family Medicine
Body dysmorphic disorder diagnosis guidelines completed in Europe
MDedge Family Medicine
Studies address primary care oral health screening and prevention for children
MDedge Family Medicine
Essential oils: How safe? How effective?
MDedge Family Medicine
Standing BP measures improve hypertension diagnosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Renewing the dream
MDedge Family Medicine
An FP’s guide to caring for patients with seizure and epilepsy
MDedge Family Medicine