News

Insurers to Pay 80%–85% of Premium on Medical Care


 

Beginning next year, health insurance companies will be required to prove that they spend at least 80% of premium dollars collected on direct medical care and quality improvement efforts under new federal regulations.

The interim final rule takes effect Jan. 1 and was required by the Affordable Care Act. The so-called medical loss ratio rule was developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, which submitted its recommendations to the Health and Human Services department in late October.

According to the rule, HHS will review insurers' medical loss data at the end of 2010. Companies that spend less than 80%-85% of their premium dollar on direct medical care will be required to issue rebates to consumers, said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius at a press briefing. The rebate checks will begin arriving in 2012.

In some markets, insurers spend as little as 60% of the premium dollar on direct care, said Ms. Sebelius, who added that under the rule, those companies might have “to return nearly $3,500 to every family they insure.” Her calculation was based on an average annual premium of $13,250 paid by a family of four.

Ms. Sebelius and other HHS officials said the rule was an important new consumer law. An estimated total of 74.8 million Americans will be protected by the new medical loss ratio requirements, and up to 9 million Americans could be eligible for rebates in the first year, according to HHS.

Timothy Jost, a professor of law at Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Va., who advised the NAIC task force, said he estimated that insurers now spend 12% of the premium dollar on pharmaceuticals and 31% for physician services, and 31% on administrative costs.

The rule “will drive insurers to become more efficient,” and “incentivize them to not raise premiums more than necessary,” Mr. Jost said during the briefing.

Perhaps in response to opponents who have complained that the passage of the ACA was a closed-door process, HHS and NAIC officials at the briefing said that the medical loss ratio rule had been developed in a very public fashion, with open hearings.

“These rules were carefully developed through a transparent and fair process with significant input from the public, the states, and other key stakeholders,” said Jay Angoff, director of the HHS Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight.

Jane Cline, president of the NAIC and insurance commissioner for West Virginia, said there were safeguards in the rule to ensure that it would not destabilize the insurance markets. The HHS Secretary will have the ability to adjust the medical loss ratio on a state-by-state basis to ensure that there is access to insurance, Ms. Cline said.

Four states – Maine, Iowa, South Carolina, and Georgia – have already asked HHS to change the requirements for insurers operating there; others could follow suit, Mr. Angoff said.

Transparency will be required of insurers as well. Starting in 2011 they will have to report publicly how they spend their premium dollars.

Recommended Reading

Medicare Clock Ticks Toward 23% Cut Dec. 1
MDedge Family Medicine
NCQA Seeks Comment On Draft ACO Criteria
MDedge Family Medicine
NCQA: Revised PCMH Application Process Easier
MDedge Family Medicine
GOP House Majority Will Roil Reform Progress
MDedge Family Medicine
Doctors Don't Agree on How to Reform Medicare Payment
MDedge Family Medicine
Primary Care Pay Trails Surgery, Specialty Care : Procedure-oriented specialists earned 36%-48% more than did primary care providers in 2004-2005.
MDedge Family Medicine
Policy & Practice : Want more health reform news? Subscribe to our podcast – search 'Policy & Practice' in the iTunes store
MDedge Family Medicine
Cutting Drug Copayments Boosts Compliance
MDedge Family Medicine
Medicare May Be Stifled in Effective Use of Data
MDedge Family Medicine
A Lesson in Taking Social Media to the Medical Level
MDedge Family Medicine