News

GAD Vaccine for Type 1 Diabetes Shows Continued Promise

View on the News

When to Intervene?

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease caused by interplay of genetic and environmental factors. The incidence of childhood T1D has doubled worldwide over the past 20-25 years. Elimination of the environmental agent(s) responsible for this epidemic would be the most efficient approach to primary prevention; however, more work is needed to identify the environmental agents and to develop effective interventions.

Blocking progression from islet autoimmunity to clinical diabetes or secondary prevention has been attempted, so far to no avail, by a number of groups, including large randomized trials: the Diabetes Prevention Trial – Type 1, the European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial, and the Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Project.

Trials in patients with newly diagnosed T1D aim at tertiary prevention, such as preservation of remaining islet beta-cells to induce and prolong partial remission. Unfortunately, most islets have already been destroyed by the time diabetes is diagnosed and complete reversal of diabetes is highly unlikely. Benefits may include a simpler insulin regimen, lower HbA1c, and reduced risk of hypoglycemia and microvascular complications. The gain may be even greater if the intervention is applied as soon as the patient shows asymptomatic “dysglycemia,” detected by oral glucose tolerance test or A1c, before overt symptoms of diabetes.

While new interventions are often tested first in patients with established diabetes, and, when proven safe, applied to patients with pre-T1D, efficacy after diagnosis of diabetes is not to be a precondition to application in pre-T1D, as there may be a “point of no return” in the destruction of the islets, rendering some interventions effective only at the earlier stages of the process.

Antigen-specific vaccines

Among several approaches to prevention of T1D, “vaccination” using islet autoantigens (intact or altered peptides derived from insulin, GAD65 or other proteins) stands out as potentially inducing long-term tolerance by induction of regulatory T-cells that down-regulate immunity to autoantigens. Until recently, trials of insulin administered parenterally, orally, or intranasally have been unsuccessful. Therefore, the initial results from trials of the Diamyd vaccine, as reviewed here, were greeted with huge interest and excitement. The vaccine includes the whole recombinant human GAD65 (rhGAD65) molecule suspended in alum. The protective effect was most pronounced in patients treated within 3 months of diagnosis, and no serious side effects were observed.

Insulin-related molecules continue to attract great interest in vaccine development. Phase I studies have been completed or are nearing completion for a proinsulin peptide C19-A3, an insulin peptide with incomplete Freund adjuvant, and a plasmid encoding proinsulin.

Combination therapies may enhance efficacy while lowering risk of adverse events if utilizing therapies from different treatment pathways. While more targeted therapies are being employed, immunomodulatory agents are still relatively nonspecific and potentially toxic to some of the trial participants. Some may carry an unacceptable risk of long-term complications. This direction is important; however, multiple scientific and logistic issues remain, for example, the anticipated duration, toxicity, and complexity of immunotherapy.

In the long run, primary prevention will likely be the optimal approach to the prevention of T1D. Once more than one islet autoantibody is present, most individuals progress to diabetes in 5-10 years. The TrialNet consortium (www.diabetestrialnet.org) systematically evaluates therapies in new-onset patients as well as in pre-diabetic subjects, and invites proposals from the research community at large.

Marian Rewers, M.D., Ph.D., is professor of pediatrics and preventive medicine at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado, Denver.


 

Other autoantibodies commonly present in patients with type 1 diabetes, or at high risk for the disease, include insulin autoantibodies, islet cell autoantibodies, and antibodies to the zinc transporter. Combining the GAD vaccine with other major diabetes-specific autoantigens recognized by the immune system could provide synergistic benefits.

Dr. Jay S. Skyler

The likely necessity for a combined approach addressing multiple pathways was underscored in a separate presentation by Dr. Jay S. Skyler, chairman of the type 1 Diabetes TrialNet, a National Institutes of Health–funded international network of centers conducting clinical trials of diabetes therapies.

The GAD vaccine appears to have the same limitation as the other immunomodulatory therapies evaluated to date in clinical trials, including the B cell–depleting anti-CD20 agent rituximab, and the anti-CD3 biologics teplizumab and otelixizumab: namely, they preserve beta cell function for a while, but the effect is transient. Eventually fasting C-peptide levels start to fall off in parallel to the placebo group. That’s why combination therapy will probably be required in order to cure or prevent Type 1 diabetes, according to Dr. Skyler, a professor of medicine, pediatrics and psychology at the University of Miami.

Ideally, a combination therapy should be multipronged, with three goals: Stop immune destruction, preserve beta-cell mass, and replace or regenerate beta-cells. Such a regimen might start off with a potent anti-inflammatory therapy – perhaps an anti-interleukin-1beta agent or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor – to quell the metabolic stress surrounding the pancreatic islets. This might well need to be given on a continuing basis.

Next would come an immunomodulatory approach; for example, T-cell modulation with an anti-CD3 biologic or B cell depletion with rituximab. This could be followed up with an autoantigen-specific therapy such as the GAD vaccine or oral insulin. “Maybe it needs to be both,” Dr. Skyler continued.

The logical subsequent step would be to try to stimulate immunologic expansion of regulatory T cells, either with granulocyte colony–stimulating factor or by direct infusion of regulatory T cells themselves. This could be combined with beta-cell expansion via exenatide (Byetta) or the investigational HIP2B peptide.

“We could conceivably be doing some of these things even today,” Dr. Skyler said.

Dr. Ludvigsson reported receiving research grant support from Diamyd.

Dr. Skyler has served as a consultant to and/or received research grants from numerous pharmaceutical companies.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Weight, Fat Gain in Middle and Older Age Linked to Diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
Diabetes Diagnosis Raised Risk of Depression
MDedge Family Medicine
Weekly Exenatide Topped Daily Insulin Glargine : In exenatide patients, 60% had an HbA1c of less than 7%, compared with 48% of glargine patients.
MDedge Family Medicine
Intranasal Insulin Might Improve Mild Cognitive Impairment
MDedge Family Medicine
Tighter BP Control Not Better for Some Diabetics
MDedge Family Medicine
Data Watch: Top 10 Therapeutic Classes by U.S. Sales, 2009
MDedge Family Medicine
Survival Improving in Type 1, but Challenges Remain
MDedge Family Medicine
Type 2 Diabetes Linked to Complications in Teens
MDedge Family Medicine
Thiazolidinediones Tied to Increased Risk of Fracture
MDedge Family Medicine
White Rice Raised Diabetes Risk, Brown Rice Lowered It
MDedge Family Medicine