News

TV content affects children's behavior over time

View on the News

Crazy not to try this new approach

Reviewing the studies by Dr. Christakis and Ms. Robertson, Dr. Claire McCarthy couldn’t help thinking about Albert Einstein’s famous definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Physicians have been advocating for years that children not watch TV more than 2 hours per day, yet U.S. children still watch 3-4 hours per day, on average. The message from physicians, however, largely hasn’t changed: "Turn it off."

"In the face of overwhelming evidence that the behavior is not changing, I am pretty sure that qualifies as insane," Dr. McCarthy wrote. "It is time to change our approach."

She lauded Dr. Christakis’s study as an example of how parental guidance could change. Physicians should switch the emphasis in their messages away from screen time and toward the effects of TV content "because it is the outcomes that matter," she said.

You don’t need to imply that watching TV all day is okay. Keep encouraging parents to shut off the TV and get children outside and playing. "But this cannot be all we do," she stressed. Physicians could find ways to help TV and video program creators add prosocial and other helpful content, not unlike efforts to get them to decrease cigarette smoking in movies.

"It is a variation on the ‘if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em’ idea," Dr. McCarthy wrote. "If the screens are going to be on, let’s concentrate on the content, and how we can make it work for children."

Dr. McCarthy is a pediatrician at Boston Children’s Hospital and is with Harvard Medical School, Boston. These comments were excerpted from her editorial published in the same issue as the two studies (Pediatrics 2013;131:589-90). She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.


 

FROM PEDIATRICS

The amount of TV viewing was not associated, however, with the likelihood of being convicted of a violent crime.

The study controlled for the effects of childhood socioeconomic status, IQ, early antisocial behavior, and level of parental control. The study did not track what kinds of programs were viewed.

The results were consistent with previous studies reporting an association between TV viewing and subsequent antisocial behavior, except for two studies that did not find these associations, Ms. Robertson noted. One was funded by the TV industry and excluded nearly a third of patients, potentially skewing the results, and the other had only a 1-year follow-up.

Dr. Christakis and Ms. Robertson reported having no financial disclosures. The teen study received funding support from the National Institutes of Health and grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and the William T. Grant Foundation. The preschool study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and NIH.

s.boschert@elsevier.com

On Twitter @sherryboschert

Pages

Recommended Reading

Marijuana Use, Perceptions Changing in 12th Graders
MDedge Family Medicine
Photo-aging tool dissuades teens from smoking
MDedge Family Medicine
Loss of autism diagnosis and symptoms achievable, with caveats
MDedge Family Medicine
DMDD diagnosis will house only some children with rages
MDedge Family Medicine
Job stress not linked with cancer risk
MDedge Family Medicine
DSM-5 likely to improve identification of preschoolers with PTSD
MDedge Family Medicine
Folic acid supplements linked to lower autism risk
MDedge Family Medicine
Anxiety disorder category to shrink under DSM-5
MDedge Family Medicine
CDC: Multiple cases link synthetic cannabinoid, kidney injury
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Expert discusses ADHD and atopic dermatitis link
MDedge Family Medicine