Clinical Inquiries

Is nedocromil effective in preventing asthmatic attacks in patients with asthma?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The inherent waxing and waning nature of asthma makes demonstrating benefits difficult. Furthermore, nedocromil tends to have an all-ornothing effect rather than a dose-response gradient. Unfortunately, none of these trials found useful predictors to help clinicians determine which patients respond.1,5

In a Cochrane Review, 20 RCTs involving 280 participants showed that 4 mg (2 puffs) of nedocromil inhaled 15 to 60 minutes prior to exercise significantly reduced the severity and duration of exercise-induced asthma for both adults and children. The maximum percentage fall in FEV1 improved significantly compared with placebo, with a weighted mean difference of 15.5% (95% confidence interval, 13.2–18.1). In addition, the time to complete recovery was shortened from 30 minutes with placebo to 10 minutes with nedocromil.6

TABLE
Classification of asthma

ClassificationSymptom frequencySpirometry findings
Severe persistentContinual symptomsPEFR <60% Variability >30%
Moderate persistentDaily symptoms, more than 1 night per weekPEFR >60% but <80% Variability >30%
Mild persistentMore than twice per week but less than daily; more than 2 nights per monthPEFR >80% Variability 20%–30%
Mild intermittentLess than once per week; less than or equal to 2 nights per monthPEFR >80% Variability <20%
Source: Global Initiative for Asthma, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute 2003.7

Recommendations from others

The Global Initiative for Asthma and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Expert Panel Report list nedocromil as an option for the treatment of exercise-induced asthma and mild persistent asthma for adults and children. However, it is listed as a second choice to the use of inhaled steroids in the case of mild persistent asthma. It is not recommended for moderate or severe persistent asthma, or for mild intermittent asthma.7

CLINICAL COMMENTARY

Nedocromil and cromolyn sodium are safe but many patients do not respond
Ron Baldwin, MD
University of Wyoming Family Practice Residency at Casper

Inhaled nedocromil and cromolyn sodium have long been recognized as agents with an excellent safety profile. Unfortunately, as pointed about above, many patients do not respond to these agents. In addition, 4-times-daily dosing makes compliance difficult. Clinicians and parents must weigh the theoretical risk of inhaled corticosteroid-induced growth retardation with this potential differential in effectiveness.

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

Albuterol via metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer equivalent in adults
MDedge Family Medicine
What is the best treatment for bronchiolitis?
MDedge Family Medicine
Asthma: Resource use and costs for inhaled corticosteroid vs leukotriene modifier treatment—a meta-analysis
MDedge Family Medicine
Are inhalers with spacers better than nebulizers for children with asthma?
MDedge Family Medicine
How effective are leukotriene inhibitors for asthma in children?
MDedge Family Medicine
Is there a role for theophylline in treating patients with asthma?
MDedge Family Medicine
Inhaled fluticasone superior to montelukast in persistent asthma
MDedge Family Medicine
Do written action plans improve patient outcomes in asthma? An evidence-based analysis
MDedge Family Medicine
Changes in recommended treatments for mild and moderate asthma
MDedge Family Medicine
Educational interventions improve outcomes for children with asthma
MDedge Family Medicine