Three screening tests (CBCL, P-GBI, and P-YMRS) available for the office setting use parent-reported scores, and perform best when compared with KSADS as the standard.3 These instruments were associated with likelihood ratios that significantly improved the odds of diagnosis and could allow clinicians to stratify patients as high or low risk (TABLE).3
TABLE
Likelihood ratios for 3 screening tools you can use in the office
For ages 5–10* | For ages 11–17† | |||||||
IF THE SCORE IS… | IF THE SCORE IS… | |||||||
LOW | MOD. LOW | HIGH | VERY HIGH | LOW | MOD. LOW | HIGH | VERY HIGH | |
THEN THE LR FOR THE INSTRUMENT IS… | THEN THE LR FOR THE INSTRUMENT IS… | |||||||
P-YMRS | 0.08 | 0.48 | 6.94 | 8.92 | 0.20 | 0 .32 | 4.07 | 7.41 |
P-GBI | 0.10 | 0.48 | 4.90 | 6.29 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 4.82 | 9.21 |
CBCL | 0.07 | 0.47 | 3.15 | 3.52 | 0.04 | 0.53 | 2.65 | 4.29 |
* Population studied had a 50.3% prevalence of bipolar disorder. | † Population studied had a 40.7% prevalence of bipolar disorder. |
Recommendations from others
Two consensus conferences, a Canadian guideline, and a National Institute of Mental Health round-table all concluded that there is currently no ideal test for the diagnosis of child and adolescent bipolar disorder, but that such an instrument needed to be developed.2,5,6,8 One consensus conference further concluded that the diagnosis is best made by childhood mental health specialists based on multiple informants, such as the child and parents, with symptoms present in at least 2 settings or by direct observation.6
A Canadian consensus conference proposed screening patients with depressive symptoms for a history of hypomanic or manic symptoms, and consider an underlying mood disorder in those with vague or nonspecific somatic symptoms or reverse vegetative symptoms (eg, hypersomnia and hyperphagia). Their recommendations also emphasized screening for family history of bipolar disorder when there were clinical concerns.8