DPP-4 inhibitors promote the effects of endogenous GLP-1 by inhibiting its breakdown by the enzyme DPP-4. By increasing GLP-1, these agents achieve mild glucose lowering while remaining weight neutral.16 DPP-4 inhibitors can be combined with metformin and other oral agents and are not associated with hypoglycemia.16
Injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists provide supraphysiologic levels of GLP-1, resulting in increased insulin secretion, reduced glucagon secretion, delayed gastric emptying, increased satiety, and weight loss.16 Research has shown that exenatide can decrease mean weight by 7 kg over 2.4 years.18,19 Exenatide is dosed subcutaneously twice daily, while liraglutide is administered once daily. Once-weekly exenatide was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2012. A recent study showed once-weekly exenatide lowered A1C levels, reduced weight, and caused fewer episodes of hypoglycemia compared with adding insulin glargine to the regimen when diabetes was uncontrolled on metformin (with or without a sulfonylurea).20 Patients may experience nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea at the onset of use of GLP-1 agonists.21 Slow titration and forewarning the patient of these adverse effects will help with compliance.
In October 2011, the FDA approved the use of exenatide with basal insulin. For patients already taking basal insulin with or without metformin or pioglitazone, adding exenatide resulted in improved A1C values and weight loss over a 30-week period.22 Reducing the dose of basal insulin at the initiation of exenatide helps decrease the incidence of hypoglycemia when considering this combination.22 Basal insulin lowers fasting glucose levels, while exenatide reduces postprandial glucose.
Although gaining in popularity, incretin therapy is being monitored for long-term safety. Cases of pancreatitis have been reported in both classes of medicines.4 Liraglutide has been associated with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) in rodents.23,24 The FDA has recommended against using liraglutide and extended-release exenatide in patients with a personal or family history of MTC.16 Although the long-term safety of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors is unknown, their novel mechanisms of action can prove useful for the right patient.
Concerns over TZDs. In addition to the FDA recommendation to avoid TZDs in patients with symptomatic heart failure, 2 studies have recently found that pioglitazone may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer.25,26 The FDA recommends avoiding use of pioglitazone in patients with active bladder cancer, and that it should be used with caution in patients with a history of cured bladder cancer. The European Medicines Agency also recommends against pioglitazone use in patients with uninvestigated macroscopic hematuria.27 The potential association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer requires further study. At this point, TZDs remain a valid second- or third-line treatment option in patients only after they are made aware of the potential risks and benefits.
CASE JR’s A1C of 7.6% is above his individualized goal of 7%. He feels he has maximized his efforts in the realm of lifestyle changes and is interested in another medication. Using the recommended patient-centered approach, we discuss with him the risks and benefits of each medication in the TABLE and we select the medication best suited to him based on adverse-effect profile.
TABLE
Matching diabetic medication attributes to patient needs
Class | Medications | Actions | Benefits | Possible adverse effects and disadvantages | A1C-lowering (%) | Cost* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biguanides | Metformin | ↓ Hepatic glucose production | Weight neutral or loss No hypoglycemia ↓ CV mortality | GI side effects Lactic acidosis Impaired B12 absorption Use caution or avoid in renal dysfunction | 1-2 | $ |
Sulfonylureas | Gliclazide Glimepiride Glipizide Glyburide | ↑ Insulin secretion | Fast-onset glucose lowering | Hypoglycemia Lack of durable glycemic control Weight gain | 1-2 | $ |
Meglitinides | Repaglinide Nateglinide | ↑ Insulin secretion | Improve meal-related insulin release and postprandial glucose | Hypoglycemia Weight gain | 0.1-2.1 | $$-$$$ |
Thiazolidinediones | Pioglitazone | ↑ Insulin sensitivity | No hypoglycemia ↑ HDL ↓ Triglycerides | Bladder cancer concerns Edema Fracture risk Heart failure Weight gain | 0.5-1.4 | $$$ |
GLP-1 receptor agonists | Exenatide Liraglutide | ↑ Insulin secretion ↓ Glucagon secretion Delayed gastric emptying Early satiety | Possible beta-cell preservation Weight loss | GI (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) Injectable Medullary thyroid tumors in rodents Pancreatitis | 0.5-1.5 | $$$ |
DPP-4 inhibitors | Linagliptin Saxagliptin Sitagliptin Vildagliptin | ↓ Glucagon secretion ↑ Insulin secretion | No hypoglycemia Weight neutral | Angioedema Pancreatitis | 0.5-0.8 | $$$ |
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors | Acarbose Miglitol | Delays carbohydrate absorption | Nonsystemic medication Reduces postprandial glucose | Frequent dosing GI side effects (abdominal cramping, flatulence) | 0.5-0.8 | $$ |
Insulin | Aspart Detemir Glargine Lispro NPH Regular | Replaces endogenous insulin | Mimics physiology Rapidly effective | Hypoglycemia Weight gain | 1.5-3.5 | $-$$$ |
CV, cardiovascular; DPP, dipeptidyl peptidase; GI, gastrointestinal; GLP, glucagon-like peptide, HDL, high-density lipoprotein. *Monthly cost of an average daily maintenance dose of available products: $, <$50; $$, $50.01-$100; $$$, >$100. Source: www.drugstore.com; accessed October 10, 2012. Adapted from: Reid TS. Options for intensifying diabetes treatment. J Fam Pract. 2011;9(suppl 1):S7-S10; American Diabetes Association Position Statement. Standards of Medical Care in Type 2 Diabetes-2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(suppl 1):S11-S63. |
Immunizations
An often overlooked but important part of the diabetes visit is reviewing the patient’s immunization history. Unless there are contraindications, all individuals with diabetes should receive the pneumococcal and annual influenza vaccines.4 In addition, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices now recommends hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine for unvaccinated adults with diabetes from ages 19 to 59.28 Unvaccinated adults with diabetes over age 60 should be vaccinated at the discretion of the provider after risk assessment.28 Patients may be at risk of contracting HBV in long-term care facilities where assisted blood sugar monitoring commonly occurs.28 Studies have shown that patients with diabetes may progress to chronic hepatitis B infection more often than patients without diabetes, and are at higher risk for nonalcoholic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma.29