From the Journals

Adding metronomic chemo provides no benefit to MAP for osteosarcoma


 

FROM CANCER

Adding low-dose metronomic chemotherapy (oral cyclophosphamide and methotrexate) to standard methotrexate, adriamycin, and platinum (MAP) maintenance treatment did not extend event-free survival in adolescents and young adults with high-grade, resectable osteosarcoma of the extremities, according to investigators.

Since metronomic chemotherapy can prevent tumor angiogenesis and is a readily available, low-cost treatment with low toxicity, it could serve as a useful add-on to established MAP maintenance therapy in this patient population, they speculated.

The investigators assessed this approach in a prospective clinical trial involving 296 patients aged younger than 30 (mean age, 14 years; range, 0-29 years) who were treated at 27 medical centers in Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay. All the study participants had high-grade but nonmetastatic operable osteosarcomas of the extremities, and all underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection, with limb salvage whenever possible.

A total of 139 patients were then randomly assigned to receive MAP plus metronomic chemotherapy (intervention group) and 157 to receive MAP alone (control group). However, 35% of the intervention group never started metronomic chemotherapy for a variety of reasons, and another 10% stopped the treatment very early.

At 5 years, cumulative event-free survival was 61% with MAP plus metronomic chemotherapy and 64% with MAP alone, a nonsignificant difference. When the analysis was restricted to only the patients in the intervention group who actually received metronomic chemotherapy, there still was no evidence that the add-on treatment made any difference in event-free survival. Similarly, mean overall survival was not significantly different between the two study groups, at 76% and 73%, respectively, Dr. Senerchia and her associates wrote (Cancer 2016 Nov 7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30411).

There were 27 deaths (19%) in the intervention group, 81% of which were due to disease progression and 11% of which were due to treatment-related toxicity. Similarly, there were 24 deaths (15%) in the control group, of which 83% were due to disease progression and 17% to treatment-related toxicity.

These findings “do not support the routine use of cyclophosphamide and methotrexate as metronomic agents after standard chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteosarcoma. However, our results should not preclude further investigation into the potential of maintenance for patients with osteosarcoma ... The combination tested here may not be optimal. In addition, adding a targeted-like effect through drug repositioning could allow more potent treatment with the addition of, for instance, valproic acid or beta-blockers,” the investigators said.

Recommended Reading

Mining for information, participation in clinical trials
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Trabectedin expands treatment options for some forms of advanced soft tissue sarcoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Second malignancy risk higher in patients with fusion-negative sarcoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Changes in HIV-related cancers reflect changes in HIV patient care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDG-PET gives early indication of response to therapy for Ewing sarcoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Palifosfamide plus doxorubicin does not improve survival in sarcoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Database review supports chemoradiation for high-risk sarcomas
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Yes, neoadjuvant chemo improves survival in soft tissue sarcomas
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA grants accelerated approval to olaratumab for soft tissue sarcoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Primary chest-wall leiomyosarcoma: a rare mimic of a malignant rib lesion
MDedge Hematology and Oncology