From the Journals

Intravenous antiemetic combination is well tolerated


 

FROM ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY


Overall, complete response rates for cycle 1 of treatment were 76.8% in the intravenous group and 84.1% in the oral treatment group, and no emesis rates were also similar (84.2% vs. 88.6%). However, the authors noted that the study was not powered to compare the efficacy of the two formulations.

Helsinn Healthcare sponsored the study and provided the drugs. Two authors were employees of the company, and four were consultants for the company. Two authors declared research support, advisory roles, and honoraria from pharmaceutical companies including Helsinn Healthcare. Three authors declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Schwartzberg L et al. Ann Oncol. 2018 May 10. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy169/4990798.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Biosimilars: same ol’ – but with a suffix, and cheaper
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Integrating survivorship care planning in radiation oncology workflow
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Enhancing communication between oncology care providers and patient caregivers during hospice
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The impact of patient education on consideration of enrollment in clinical trials
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Qualitative assessment of organizational barriers to optimal lung cancer care in a community hospital setting in the United States
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Prompt palliative care cut hospital costs in pooled study
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Reduced intensity conditioning doesn’t protect fertility
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Novel targeted cancer drugs cause fewer arrhythmias
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Marijuana: Most oncologists are having the conversation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Patients with CF at increased risk for GI cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology