From the Journals

Breast cancer: More pathogenic variants detected as multiple-gene sequencing takes over


 

FROM JAMA ONCOLOGY

The introduction of multiple-gene sequencing led to a substantial increase in detection of pathogenic variants in a study of women with breast cancer treated in community practice, results of one retrospective study show.

Multiple-gene sequencing rapidly replaced BRCA1/2 only testing over a 2-year period in the study, driven in part by technological advances and regulatory changes that made comprehensive low-cost genetic testing more accessible, investigators wrote. The report was published in JAMA Oncology.

That quick uptake increased detection of genetic variants that could change care, with no associated increase in prophylactic mastectomy over that same time period, said Allison W. Kurian, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, and her coinvestigators.

“The greater yield of clinically relevant information with multiple-gene sequencing offers a major potential advantage over more limited BRCA1/2-only tests,” noted Dr. Kurian and her colleagues.

Their analysis included 5,026 women with stage 0-II breast cancer diagnosed from January 2013 to December 2015 and enrolled in the Individualized Cancer Care (iCan Care) study. That study started enrolling 1 month before a U.S. Supreme Court decision on gene patents, which led to lower costs for multiple-gene sequencing tests for breast cancer risk, Dr. Kurian and her coinvestigators said.

Overall, about one-quarter of women in the study had genetic testing, and that did not change over time. What did change over time was the number of women undergoing multiple-gene testing: In 2013, only 25.6% underwent multiple-gene sequencing, versus 74.4% for BRCA1/2-only testing; by 2015, those figures flipped to 66.5% and 33.5%, respectively.

Multiple-gene sequencing increased detection of pathogenic variants in women at average pretest risk (4.2% versus 2.2% for BRCA1/2-only testing), according to the reported data. Detection was increased in women at high pretest risk due to young age, triple-negative breast cancer, or other factors (12% versus 7.8%).

Pages

Recommended Reading

Analgesic management in radiation oncology for painful bone metastases
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Sarcopenia, body fat linked with mortality in nonmetastatic breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Can cN0 and pCR limit axillary surgery in some breast cancer patients?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
OlympiAD: No statistically significant boost in OS with olaparib in HER2-negative mBC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Hormone therapy raises diabetes risk in breast cancer survivors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Early breast cancer: Patients report favorable quality of life after partial breast irradiation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Universal BRCA testing worthwhile for relatives of high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Integrating survivorship care planning in radiation oncology workflow
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Novel targeted cancer drugs cause fewer arrhythmias
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Intravenous antiemetic combination is well tolerated
MDedge Hematology and Oncology