Conference Coverage

Upfront NGS testing of metastatic NSCLC saves money, time


 

REPORTING FROM THE ASCO ANNUAL MEETING


Estimated time to receive test results was 2 weeks for NGS testing and for panel testing, compared with 4.7 weeks for exclusionary testing and 4.8 weeks for sequential testing.

In the CMS population, NGS testing would save about $1.4 million compared with exclusionary testing, more than $1.5 million compared with sequential testing, and about $2.1 million compared with panel testing. In the commercial health plan cohort, NGS would save $3,809 compared with exclusionary testing, $127,402 compared with sequential testing, and $250,842 compared with panel testing.

Dr. Pennell disclosed that he has a consulting or advisory role with AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Regeneron, and that his institution receives research funding from Genentech, NewLink Genetics, Clovis Oncology, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Merck. The study received funding from Novartis.

Pages

Recommended Reading

FDA approves osimertinib for first-line advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Screening tool IDs older NSCLC patients suitable for SBRT
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ALUR: Alectinib topped chemo in pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Isolated ocular metastases from lung cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Bevacizumab-awwb becomes first biosimilar approved for cancer treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Qualitative assessment of organizational barriers to optimal lung cancer care in a community hospital setting in the United States
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Checkpoint inhibitors get to patients quickly
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Delay of NSCLC surgery can lead to worse prognosis
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
E-cigarette usage has changed
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Is cancer immunotherapy more effective in men than women?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology