Conference Coverage

When is it CMML?


 

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA 2018

Karyotyping, genotyping, and immunophenotyping

“There is no disease-defining karyotype abnormality [in CMML],” Dr. Durakovic said.

She said 30% of patients have abnormal karyotype, and the most common abnormality is trisomy 8. Unlike in patients with MDS, del(5q) and monosomal karyotypes are infrequent in patients with CMML.

Similarly, there are no “disease-defining” mutations or genetic changes in CMML, although CMML is genetically distinct from MDS, Dr. Durakovic said.

For instance, SRSF2 encodes a component of the spliceosome that is mutated in almost half of CMML patients and less than 10% of MDS patients. Likewise, ASLX1 and TET2 are “much more frequently involved” in CMML than in MDS, Dr. Durakovic said.

In a 2012 study of 275 CMML patients, researchers found that 93% of patients had at least one somatic mutation in nine recurrently mutated genes – SRFS2, ASXL1, CBL, EZH2, JAK2V617F, KRAS, NRAS, RUNX1, and TET2 (Blood. 2012;120:3080-8).

However, Dr. Durakovic noted that these mutations are found in other disorders as well, so this information may not be helpful in differentiating CMML from other disorders.

A 2015 study revealed a technique that does appear useful for identifying CMML – monocyte subset distribution analysis. For this analysis, monocytes are divided into the following categories:

  • Classical/MO1 (CD14bright/CD16).
  • Intermediate/MO2 (CD14bright/CD16+).
  • Nonclassical/MO3 (CD14dim/CD16+).

The researchers found that CMML patients had an increase in the fraction of classical monocytes (with a cutoff value of 94%), as compared to healthy control subjects, patients with another hematologic disorder, and patients with reactive monocytosis (Blood. 2015 Jun 4;125[23]:3618-26).

A 2018 study confirmed that monocyte subset distribution analysis could differentiate CMML from other hematologic disorders, with the exception of atypical CML. This study also suggested that a decreased percentage of non-classical monocytes was more sensitive than an increased percentage of classical monocytes (Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 Aug 30;150[4]:293-302).

Despite the differences between these studies, “monocyte subset distribution analysis is showing promise as a method of identifying hard-to-identify CMML patients with ease and affordability,” Dr. Durakovic said.

She added that the technique can be implemented in clinical practice using the Hematoflow solution.

Dr. Durakovic did not report any conflicts of interest.

The Leukemia and Lymphoma meeting is organized by Jonathan Wood & Association, which is owned by the parent company of this news organization.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Novel targeted cancer drugs cause fewer arrhythmias
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
TKI discontinuation appears safe in CML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Optimizing use of TKIs in chronic leukemia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA issues draft guidance on MRD
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Optimizing use of TKIs in CML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
AMP publishes report on DNA variants in CMNs
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Familial risk of myeloid malignancies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Global burden of hematologic malignancies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Diabetics have higher risk of hematologic, other cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
EC approves new use, formulation of dasatinib
MDedge Hematology and Oncology