News

Global study reveals healthcare inequity, preventable deaths


 

Photo courtesy of NIH

Doctor and patient

A global study has revealed inequity of access to and quality of healthcare among and within countries and suggests people are dying from causes with well-known treatments.

“What we have found about healthcare access and quality is disturbing,” said Christopher Murray, MD, DPhil, of the University of Washington in Seattle.

“Having a strong economy does not guarantee good healthcare. Having great medical technology doesn’t either. We know this because people are not getting the care that should be expected for diseases with established treatments.”

Dr Murray and his colleagues reported these findings in The Lancet.

For this study, the researchers assessed access to and quality of healthcare services in 195 countries from 1990 to 2015.

The group used the Healthcare Access and Quality Index, a summary measure based on 32 causes* that, in the presence of high-quality healthcare, should not result in death. Leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma are among these causes.

Countries were assigned scores for each of the causes, based on estimates from the annual Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors study (GBD), a systematic, scientific effort to quantify the magnitude of health loss from all major diseases, injuries, and risk factors by age, sex, and population.

In addition, data were extracted from the most recent GBD update and evaluated using a Socio-demographic Index based on rates of education, fertility, and income.

Results

The 195 countries were assigned scores on a scale of 1 to 100 for healthcare access and quality. They received scores for the 32 causes as well as overall scores.

In 2015, the top-ranked nation was Andorra, with an overall score of 95. Its lowest treatment score was 70, for Hodgkin lymphoma.

The lowest-ranked nation was Central African Republic, with a score of 29. Its highest treatment score was 65, for diphtheria.

Nations in much of sub-Saharan Africa, as well as in south Asia and several countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, also had low rankings.

However, many countries in these regions, including China (score: 74) and Ethiopia (score: 44), have seen sizeable gains since 1990.

‘Developed’ nations falling short

The US had an overall score of 81 (in 2015), tied with Estonia and Montenegro. As with many other nations, the US scored 100 in treating common vaccine-preventable diseases, such as diphtheria, tetanus, and measles.

However, the US had 9 treatment categories in which it scored in the 60s: lower respiratory infections (60), neonatal disorders (69), non-melanoma skin cancer (68), Hodgkin lymphoma (67), ischemic heart disease (62), hypertensive heart disease (64), diabetes (67), chronic kidney disease (62), and the adverse effects of medical treatment itself (68).

“America’s ranking is an embarrassment, especially considering the US spends more than $9000 per person on healthcare annually, more than any other country,” Dr Murray said.

“Anyone with a stake in the current healthcare debate, including elected officials at the federal, state, and local levels, should take a look at where the US is falling short.”

Other nations with strong economies and advanced medical technology are falling short in some areas as well.

For example, Norway and Australia each scored 90 overall, among the highest in the world. However, Norway scored 65 in its treatment for testicular cancer, and Australia scored 52 for treating non-melanoma skin cancer.

“In the majority of cases, both of these cancers can be treated effectively,” Dr Murray said. “Shouldn’t it cause serious concern that people are dying of these causes in countries that have the resources to address them?”

*The 32 causes are:

  1. Adverse effects of medical treatment
  2. Appendicitis
  3. Breast cancer
  4. Cerebrovascular disease (stroke)
  5. Cervical cancer
  6. Chronic kidney disease
  7. Chronic respiratory diseases
  8. Colon and rectum cancer
  9. Congenital anomalies
  10. Diabetes mellitus
  11. Diarrhea-related diseases
  12. Diphtheria
  13. Epilepsy
  14. Gallbladder and biliary diseases
  15. Hodgkin lymphoma
  16. Hypertensive heart disease
  17. Inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernia
  18. Ischemic heart disease
  19. Leukemia
  20. Lower respiratory infections
  21. Maternal disorders
  22. Measles
  23. Neonatal disorders
  24. Non-melanoma skin cancer
  25. Peptic ulcer disease
  26. Rheumatic heart disease
  27. Testicular cancer
  28. Tetanus
  29. Tuberculosis
  30. Upper respiratory infections
  31. Uterine cancer
  32. Whooping cough.

Recommended Reading

Ibrutinib response in CLL/SLL less affected by select risk factors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
In good-candidate CLL, don’t wait too long for alloHCT
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug receives breakthrough designation for relapsed/refractory AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Single-cell analysis reveals TKI-resistant CML stem cells
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
First generic version of clofarabine available in US
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Antibody shows potential for treating AML, B-ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Study: Most oncologists don’t discuss exercise with patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Videos reduce need for anesthesia in kids undergoing radiotherapy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug elicits responses in MDS patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Novel inhibitor proves ‘potent’ in hematologic malignancies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology