Clinical Topics & News

Presentation of a Rare Malignancy: Leiomyosarcoma of the Prostate

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

It has been reported that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy can aid in decreasing tumor burden to facilitate a complete resection.2,8,13,14 Patients who are determined to not be candidates for surgery or whom have widespread disease may be offered systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens vary, but common regimens include anthracyclines (doxorubicin or epirubicin), alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, dacarbazine), and/or vinca alkaloids (vinblastine or vincristine). Patients who do not receive surgical intervention rarely achieve a sustained remission.3,5,8

The long-term prognosis of prostatic leiomyosarcoma is poor due to the aggressive nature of the neoplasm and the high chance of disease recurrence or metastasis. Median survival is estimated at 17 months, and from 50% to 75% of patients die within 2 to 5 years of diagnosis.2,3 Prognosis may be improved in patients with localized disease at diagnosis who are candidates for complete surgical resection with negative margins.13 Adverse prognostic factors include metastatic disease at presentation and the presence of positive surgical margins after surgery.

Overall survival is very poor, and it is estimated that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates are 68%, 34%, and 26%, respectively.3 However, some studies estimate the 5-year survival to be anywhere from 0 to 60%.8,9 Due to the substantially high risk of death, prostatic leiomyosarcoma may be one of the most aggressive and poorly prognostic malignancies involving the prostate.

Conclusion

Prostatic leiomyosarcoma poses a unique diagnostic challenge, as clinical presentation alone may not always be suggestive of underlying malignancy. This challenge is further exacerbated by its aggressive nature, high risk of metastasis, and difficulties with unclear treatment. Proper history and physical examination, differential diagnosis, and a multidisciplinary approach to patient care are the foundation for early detection and promoting improved survival.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

‘Watch and wait’ good for most – but not all – rectal cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
‘Organoid technology’ poised to transform cancer care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ASCO issues guideline for early detection, management of colorectal cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection may be an option for colorectal lesions
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Colorectal cancer diagnoses still moving up in younger adults, with no sign of plateau
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Clopidogrel matches aspirin for reducing risk of colorectal cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Lynch syndrome screening shows low efficiency in elderly
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New practice guideline: CRC screening isn’t necessary for low-risk patients aged 50-75 years
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
KRAS-mutation colon, rectal cancers have distinct survival profiles
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Sociodemographic disadvantage confers poorer survival in young adults with CRC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology