Feature

Final ‘Vision’ report addresses MOC woes


 

Instead, the commission recommends that ABMS “move quickly to formative assessment formats that are not characterized by high-stakes summative outcomes (pass/fail), specified time frames for high-stakes assessment, or require burdensome testing formats (such as testing centers or remote proctoring) that are inconsistent with the desired goals for continuing certification – support learning; identify knowledge and skills gaps; and help diplomates stay current.”

The commission also defined how the certification process should be used by other stakeholders.

“ABMS must demonstrate and communicate that continuing certification has value, meaning, and purpose in the health care environment,” the report states. “Hospitals, health systems, payers, and other health care organizations can independently decide what factors are used in credentialing and privileging decisions. ABMS must inform these organizations that continuing certification should not be the only criterion used in these decisions, and these organizations should use a wide portfolio of criteria in these decisions. ABMS must encourage hospitals, health systems, payers, and other health care organizations to not deny credentialing or privileging to a physician solely on the basis of certification status.”

Additionally, the commission report states that “ABMS and the ABMS Boards should collaborate with specialty societies, the [continuing medical education/continuing professional development] community, and other expert stakeholders to develop the infrastructure to support learning activities that produce data-driven advances in clinical practice. The ABMS Boards must ensure that their continuing certification programs recognize and document participation in a wide range of quality assessment activities in which diplomates already engage.”

The report adds that the boards “should readily accept existing activities that diplomates are doing to advance their clinical practice and to provide credit for performing low-resource, high-impact activities as part of their daily practice routine.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

Terminating an employee
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Survey: Health care costs, access unlikely to improve in 2019
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Fund projects, not people to address gender bias in research funding
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ONC aims to help docs, patients with information sharing in proposed rule
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CMS proposes coverage of CAR T-cell therapy in trials
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Culture change needed to improve gender inequalities in medicine
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
McAneny: Transparency needed for meaningful talk on drug pricing
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Matching clinical, claims data essential for value-based care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Health spending: Boomers will spike costs, but growing uninsured will soften their impact
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Lawsuit against ABIM draws $200,000 in donation support
MDedge Hematology and Oncology