From the Journals

Skip metastasis rate low in node-negative oral cancers

View on the News

Actually, doctors should include neck level IV in these scenarios

Although this meta-analysis shows that the risk of level IV involvement is less than 5% in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) oral cavity cancers, going beyond standard supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND) may still be warranted for specific patients.

While the authors conclude that elective treatment of level IV is not required in patients with cN0 oral cavity cancer, there are two situations in which clinicians should consider adding level IV to standard SOHND.

The first is when a patient has gross macroscopic disease in upper levels, particularly level III. Most studies in the meta-analysis had insufficient data to determine whether involvement of upper levels increased risk of level IV involvement. When encountering gross disease during an elective neck dissection, some researchers have recommended including level IV and V.

The second scenario is when a posterolateral oral tongue cancer is near or at the tongue base, since oropharyngeal cancers are known to drain to levels II-IV.

The decision to make exceptions in these two situations should be based on the combination of clinical judgment and evidence-based medicine in certain situations. That said, for most patients with cNO oral cavity cancer, SOHND is enough.

Arun Sharma, MD, MS , is with the division of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at Southern Illinois University, Springfield. He had no conflict of interest related to his editorial, which appears in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery .


 

FROM JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY–HEAD & NECK SURGERY

In patients with clinically node-negative oral cavity cancers, the rate of skip metastasis to neck level IV is extremely low, according to authors of a recent meta-analysis.

The rate of level IV involvement was about 2.5%, and the rate of skip metastasis was 0.5% in the analysis, which comprised 11 retrospective studies and 2 randomized clinical trials including a total of 1,359 patients with clinically node-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas.

Encountering a suspected positive lymph node during neck dissection does not appear to be an indicator of high rates of level IV involvement, according to Anton Warshavsky, MD, and colleagues in the department of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery and maxillofacial surgery at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel.

“Supraomohyoid neck dissection [SOHND] is adequate for this subset of patients,” Dr. Warshavsky and coauthors wrote in a report on the study that appears in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery.

SOHND, a type of selective neck dissection, refers to removal of lymph nodes in levels I-III. This approach is now frequently used in managing clinically node-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and provides control rates similar to those associated with more extensive neck dissections, Dr. Warshavsky and colleagues wrote.

However, concern regarding the risk of skip metastases, or involvement of neck level IV without involvement of lower levels, has stirred controversy. SOHND might not be adequate in these patients because of the possibility of occult metastasis to neck level IV.

Accordingly, Dr. Warshavsky and colleagues combed the available medical literature to find relevant articles for a meta-analysis to better characterize the rate of skip metastasis to level IV in patients who had undergone neck dissection.

Level IV involvement rates in clinically node-negative patients ranged from 0% to 11.4% in the 13 included studies. Based on fixed-effects modeling, the rate of involvement was 2.53% (95% CI, 1.64-3.55%), according to the published report.

The rate of skip metastasis was “extremely low,” wrote Dr. Warshavsky and coauthors. Rates ranged from 0% to 5.50%, with a fixed-effects model of 0.50% (95% CI, 0.09%-1.11%).

Cases involving higher levels of the neck did not impact the rate of level IV metastasis, results of a subgroup analysis found. Likewise, an analysis based on T stage showed that rates of level 4 involvement were comparable and low for T stages I-II and III-IV.

These findings are limited, however, not only by the retrospective nature of this study, but also by the fact that many studies reported limited data, hampering the investigators’ ability to run statistics and perform subgroup analyses.

“Unfortunately, data in almost all of the analyzed articles failed to report the relations between the primary tumor site and the neck levels involved by metastatic tumor,” they wrote. “Only primary lesions of the tongue could be accurately assessed.”

Dr. Warshavsky and coauthors reported no conflicts of interest related to the research.

SOURCE: Warshavsky A et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May 9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0784.

Recommended Reading

Survival after squamous recurrence may be unaffected by immune status
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
BWH classification system better predicts outcomes in HNCSCC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Head and neck cancer cost analysis yields simple bundled payment model
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
High pCR rate in HPV+ HNSCC with nivolumab/SBRT
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Increase in pediatric thyroid cancers: overdiagnosis or something more?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ASCO: Deintensified treatment in p16+ oropharyngeal cancer needs evaluation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Oropharynx cancer burden is shifting to older men
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ultrasound offers advantages for long-term lymph node surveillance in high-grade SCC patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Post-treatment persistence of oral HPV in HNSCC predicts recurrence, death
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
PET imaging at diagnosis improves oropharyngeal cancer outcomes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology