Feature

Large state disparities seen for lung cancer screening


 

In Massachusetts, the rate of lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals is almost 25 times higher than that seen in Nevada, according to the American Lung Association.

That disparity might suggest that Massachusetts has an exceptionally high rate, but it’s only 12.3%. And that means Nevada’s rate is very low, which it is: Only 0.5% of those at high risk are getting screened with annual low-dose CT scans, the ALA said in its 2019 State of Lung Cancer report.

“[The low rate of screening] may be because of a lack of access or low awareness and knowledge among patients and providers. As rates vary tremendously between states, it is clear that more can be done to increase screening rates,” the ALA stated.

Nationally, the screening rate is 4.2% among those at high risk for lung cancer, but “if everyone currently eligible were screened, close to 48,000 lives could be saved,” the ALA noted in its report.

Six states other than Nevada are below the 2% mark: Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wyoming. Besides Massachusetts, the three other states above 10% are Kentucky, New Hampshire, and Vermont, according to data from the American College of Radiology’s Lung Cancer Screening Registry state-level comparison for 2018.

For individuals at high risk for lung cancer – those aged 55-80 years who have at least a 30 pack-year history and either still smoke or have quit within 15 years – “screening with annual low-dose CT scans can reduce the lung cancer death rate by up to 20% by detecting tumors at early stages when the cancer is more likely to be curable,” the ALA wrote.

Recommended Reading

Levothyroxine dose for checkpoint inhibitor toxicity may be too high
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Fluoroscopic system can improve targeting of lung lesions
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Nivolumab benefit for NSCLC persists at 5-year follow-up
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Lung cancer on the decline, but still higher among men than women
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Atezolizumab bests chemo in NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
‘You had me at hello’: ESMO studies confirm survival benefits in NSCLC and breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Lorlatinib induces deep responses in ROS1-positive NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Neoantigen vaccine appears safe and active in NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Not all lung cancer patients receive treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Expanding the reach of available cancer therapies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology