From the Journals

Easing access to DLBCL treatments: Patient study reveals racial differences


 

FROM JCO

Personalized treatment strategies

The findings provide important perspective on the need to address patients’ concerns and circumstances to improve access to cellular therapies, said Ankit Kansagra, MD, the Eugene P. Frenkel, M.D. Scholar in Clinical Medicine at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

Ankit Kansagra, MD, of the University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas

Dr. Ankit Kansagra

The unique focus by Dr. Frosch and his associates on the patient perspective versus the health care system perspective underscores the need to be patient-focused, and serves as a reminder that different strategies are needed for different patients, Dr. Kansagra, who has also conducted research on access to CAR T therapies, said in an interview.

For some patients, a shared model of care is much more important than a 5% improvement in survival, he said, adding that providers shouldn’t assume that they understand a patient’s perspective.

Devising hybrid solutions that take community and individual needs into consideration would be preferable to seeking one national solution for care access, he added.

“It’s also pretty clear from this that it can be a shared model versus just an academic center or community center doing everything,” he said. “I think that’s going to be the next frontier – [determining] how we can hand over a patient, once CAR T is done, back to the community oncologist so he or she can continue following the patient and knows the survivorship plan – and keeping that model in place.”


Next steps

Further work is needed to determine the mechanisms driving the differences observed between Black and White patients in this study, the authors said, explaining that “[a]lthough the differences observed by race may reflect structural racism-driven access inequities, the relatively small subsample of Black patients and model complexity constraints limited our ability to analyze multiple factors.

“A prospective validation study to demonstrate the association of stated preferences with real-world decisions would further support our findings,” they wrote.

Dr. Frosch reported having no conflicts of interest. Dr. Kansagra is on advisory boards for Alnylam, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cota Healthcare, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, and Takeda.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Don’t delay: Cancer patients need both doses of COVID vaccine
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Poor survival with COVID in patients who have had HSCT
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Evidence favors lower-dose R-CHOP for fit, very elderly DLBCL patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
High-dose methotrexate of no CNS benefit for patients with high-risk DLBCL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Choosing the right R-CHOP dosage for elderly patients with DLBCL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Experimental antibody-drug conjugate shown active against r/r DLBCL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Real-world CAR T outcomes for DLBCL mimic clinical trials
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
COVID boosters help protect blood cancer patients, but some still vulnerable
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
On improving DLBCL outcomes, single-agent regimens fall short
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New trials in lymphoma and MM: Could your patient benefit?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology