From the Journals

At-home colorectal cancer testing and follow-up vary by ethnicity


 

Some unanswered questions

“Overall this study supports other studies of a disparity in colorectal cancer screening for African Americans,” John M. Carethers, MD, told this news organization when asked to comment. “This is known for FIT and colonoscopy, and Cologuard, which is a genetic test in addition to FIT, appears to be in that same realm.”

“Noninvasive tests will have a role to reach populations who may not readily have access to colonoscopy,” said Dr. Carethers, John G. Searle Professor and chair of the department of internal medicine and professor of human genetics at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. “The key here is if the test is positive, it needs to be followed up with a colonoscopy.”

Dr. Carethers added that the study raises some unanswered questions; for example, does the cost difference between testing options make a difference?

“FIT is under $20, but Cologuard is generally $300 or more,” he said. What percentage of the study population were offered other options, such as FIT? How does insurance status affect screening in different populations?”

“The findings should be taken in context of what other screening options were offered to or elected by patients,” agreed Gregory S. Cooper, MD, professor of medicine and population and quantitative health sciences at Case Western Reserve University and a gastroenterologist at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center.

According to guidelines, patients can be offered a menu of options, including FIT, colonoscopy, and Cologuard, Dr. Cooper said in an interview.

“If more African Americans elected colonoscopy, for example, the findings may balance out,” said Dr. Cooper, who was not affiliated with the study. “It would also be of interest to know if the racial differences changed over time. With the pandemic, the use of noninvasive options, such as Cologuard, have increased.”

“I will note that specifically for colonoscopy in the United States, the disparity gap had been closing from about 15% to 18% 20 years ago to about 3% in 2020 pre-COVID,” Dr. Carethers added. “I am fearful that COVID may have led to a widening of that gap again as we get more data.”

“It is important that noninvasive tests for screening be a part of the portfolio of offerings to patients, as about 35% of eligible at-risk persons who need to be screened are not screened in the United States,” Dr. Carethers said.

The study was not industry sponsored. Dr. Ouni and Dr. Carethers report no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Cooper has received consulting fees from Exact Sciences.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Deep learning system outmatches pathologists in diagnosing liver lesions
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medical education programs tell how climate change affects health
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Myositis guidelines aim to standardize adult and pediatric care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Study shows link between dairy consumption and cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Gallstone disease may be a harbinger of pancreatic cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
AUA 2022: A report from the trenches
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CRC screening: Blood test accuracy compared to colonoscopy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Alarming increase in esophageal cancer in middle-aged adults
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Bariatric surgery cuts risk of developing and dying from cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Esophageal cancer screening isn’t for everyone: Study
MDedge Hematology and Oncology