FDA/CDC

Patient safety vs. public health: The ethylene oxide dilemma


 

Ethylene oxide is a compound used to sterilize more than 20 billion devices sold in the U.S. every year. Although this sterilization process helps keep medical devices – and patients – safe, the odorless, flammable gas may also be harming people who live near sterilization plants and who may inhale the compound, which has been linked to an elevated risk of cancer.

Regulatory agencies are currently feuding over the best way to address the dilemma: preserving patient safety versus protecting public health. Lawmakers are weighing in on the matter, which has been the source of multiple civil lawsuits filed by individuals who say they have suffered health problems as a result of exposure to ethylene oxide.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration agree that use of the compound should be limited, but they are at odds about how quickly limits should be put in place, according to Axios.

A new commercial standard for ethylene oxide proposed by the EPA in April would impose stricter emission restrictions for sterilization facilities and chemical plants – a move that would cut ethylene oxide emissions by 80%, the EPA estimates.

While the FDA says it “shares concerns about the release of ethylene oxide at unsafe levels into the environment,” the agency cautions that moving too fast to cut emissions would disrupt the medical supply chain, which is already experiencing turbulence. The U.S. has been facing the worst drug supply shortages in a decade in addition to severe medical device shortages.

Currently, other methods of sterilization cannot replace the use of ethylene oxide for many devices. Ethylene oxide is used to sterilize about half of all medical devices in the U.S., the FDA says. Given the country’s reliance on this compound for sterilization, the FDA says it is “equally concerned about the potential impact of shortages of sterilized medical devices that would result from disruptions in commercial sterilizer facility operations.”

In 2019, Illinois temporarily closed a sterilization facility over concern regarding ethylene oxide emissions. The closure caused a shortage of a pediatric breathing tube.

Some lawmakers agree that an Interior-Environment bill would require FDA certification that any action by the EPA would not cause a medical device shortage.

The FDA has been working to identify safe alternatives to ethylene oxide for sterilizing medical supplies as well as strategies to reduce emissions of ethylene oxide by capturing the gas or by turning it into a harmless byproduct. In 2019, the FDA launched a pilot program to incentivize companies to develop new sterilization technologies.

“The FDA remains focused in our commitment to encourage novel ways to sterilize medical devices while reducing adverse impacts on the environment and public health and developing solutions to avoid potential shortages of devices that the American public relies upon,” the agency said.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Anticoagulants for cancer-related VTE: What works best?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Survival, QoL trump PFS for most patients with cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ten tips for boosting patient communication
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Who owns your genes?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Neutropenia affects clinical presentation of pulmonary mucormycosis
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer diagnoses, care access rise after Medicaid expansion
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Autoantibodies could help predict cancer risk in scleroderma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Black women weigh emerging risks of ‘creamy crack’ hair straighteners
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Antibody shows promise in preventing GVHD
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug name confusion: More than 80 new drug pairs added to the list
MDedge Hematology and Oncology