From the AGA Journals

Meta-analysis of postcancer use of immunosuppressive therapies shows no increase in cancer recurrence risk


 

FROM CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY

Timing of therapy

The new meta-analysis confirms and expands a previous meta-analysis published in Gastroenterology in 2016 that showed no impact of treatment – primarily IMM or anti-TNF treatment – on cancer recurrence in patients with immune-mediated diseases, Dr. Gupta and coauthors wrote.

The 2016 meta-analysis reported similar cancer recurrence rates with IMMs and anti-TNFs when immunosuppression was introduced before or after 6 years of cancer diagnosis. In the new meta-analysis – with twice the number of patients, a longer duration of follow-up, and the inclusion of other biologic therapies – a stratification of results at the median interval of therapy initiation similarly found no increased risk before 5 years, compared with after 5 years.

“Although several existing guidelines recommend avoiding immunosuppression for 5 years after the index cancer, our results indicate that it may be safe to initiate these agents earlier than 5 years, at least in some patients,” Dr. Gupta and coauthors wrote, mentioning the possible impact of selection bias and surveillance bias in the study. Ongoing registries “may help answer this question more definitively with prospectively collected data, but inherently may suffer from this selection bias as well.”

Assessment of the newer biologics ustekinumab and vedolizumab is limited by the low number of studies (four and five, respectively) and by limited duration of follow-up. “Longer-term evaluation after these treatments is essential but it is reassuring that in the early analysis we did not observe an increase and in fact noted numerically lower rates of cancers,” they wrote.

It is also “critically important” to generate more data on JAK inhibitors, and to further study the safety of combining systemic chemotherapy and the continuation of IBD therapy in the setting of a new cancer diagnosis, they wrote.

The study was funded in part by grants from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, and the Chleck Family Foundation. Dr. Gupta disclosed no conflicts. One coauthor disclosed consulting for Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, and other companies, and receiving grants from several companies. Another coauthor disclosed serving on the scientific advisory boards for AbbVie and other companies, and receiving research support from Pfizer.

Pages

Recommended Reading

CRC screening rates are higher in Medicaid expansion states
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New AI tool may help predict best treatments for colorectal cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
How BMI over time impacts GI cancer risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Unprecedented drop seen in early colorectal cancer cases due to aspirin use
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Should race and ethnicity be used in CRC recurrence risk algorithms?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
‘Game changer’ data for vitamin D in digestive tract cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
AI tool predicts certain GI cancers years in advance
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Hemostatic powder superior in controlling tumor bleeding
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
High-risk colon polyps detected at screening colonoscopy linked to liver cancer death
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Microsimulation model identifies 4-year window for pancreatic cancer screening
MDedge Hematology and Oncology