Latest News

Treatment Sequence May Impact Pancreatic Cancer Survival


 

TOPLINE:

The sequence of systematic therapies for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma may have an impact on patient survival, a new retrospective analysis suggests.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Despite therapeutic advances, survival among patients with unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has not markedly improved in recent years.
  • In the current analysis, researchers evaluated whether treatment sequence could affect survival outcomes in this patient population.
  • To this end , researchers conducted a single institution, retrospective analysis of patients who received different lines of treatment between January 2015 and December 2021.
  • The most common first-line therapy was nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (58%), followed by FOLFIRINOX (10%), nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (8%), gemcitabine alone (7%), gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (6%); second-line therapies, in order of frequency, included gemcitabine combination therapy (48%), nab-paclitaxel combination therapy (19%), FOLFIRINOX (10%), and gemcitabine alone (7%); third-line treatments consisted of FOLFIRINOX (31%), irinotecan or oxaliplatin combination therapy (23%), immunotherapy (19%), and gemcitabine combination therapy (10%).

TAKEAWAY:

  • Overall, progression occurred in 90% of patients, and the median overall survival was 12.0 months, with only 48% of patients able to start a third-line therapy.
  • The researchers focused on three common therapy sequences: nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or nab-paclitaxel combination therapy as first-line and FOLFIRINOX as second-line (line A); nab-paclitaxel combination therapy to gemcitabine combination therapy to FOLFIRINOX (line B); and nab-paclitaxel combination therapy, to gemcitabine combination therapy, to oxaliplatin or irinotecan combination therapy (line C).
  • Overall, the researchers observed a median overall survival of 14 months among patients receiving line A and C sequences and 18 months with line B.
  • Patients receiving line B therapy demonstrated a 52% lower risk for death compared with those receiving line A treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; P = .018) and a 75% reduced risk for death compared with those on the line C sequence (HR, 0.25; P = .040).

IN PRACTICE:

“Our study provides real-world evidence for the effectiveness of different treatment sequences and underscores the [impact of] treatment sequences on survival outcome when considering the entire management in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” the authors concluded.

SOURCE:

The study, led by Guanghai Dai, MD, from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, was published in BMC Cancer on January 12, 2024.

LIMITATIONS:

The study was a single-center, retrospective analysis.

DISCLOSURES:

The paper was funded by Beijing natural science foundation. The authors did not declare any relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Standard Therapy Beats Out Primary Surgery in Rectal Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Radiation Oncologists Fight for Payment Reform Amid Cuts
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
No Compelling Evidence of Pancreatic Cancer Risk With GLP-1s
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunotherapy Combo Wins Big on PFS in First-Line Mets CRC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Targeted Colorectal Cancer Combo Improves QoL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Hepatic infusion pumps: New enthusiasm for an old technology
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The Case for Biomarker Testing in Gastroesophageal Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Bladder Cancer: Is Active Surveillance the Way Forward?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Dana-Farber Moves to Retract, Correct Dozens of Cancer Papers Amid Allegations
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ctDNA’s Prognostic Strength, Low Sensitivity Seen in Studies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology