From the Journals

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Don’t Raise Thyroid Cancer Risk


 

TOPLINE:

No significant association was found between the use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and thyroid cancer over nearly 4 years.

METHODOLOGY:

  • A cohort study using data from nationwide registers in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden between 2007 and 2021 included 145,410 patients who initiated GLP-1 RAs and 291,667 propensity score-matched patients initiating dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors as active comparators.
  • Additional analysis included 111,744 who initiated GLP-1 RAs and 148,179 patients initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.
  • Overall, mean follow-up time was 3.9 years, with 25% followed for more than 6 years.

TAKEAWAY:

  • The most common individual GLP-1 RAs were liraglutide (57.3%) and semaglutide (32.9%).
  • During follow-up, there were 76 incident thyroid cancer cases among GLP-1 RA users and 184 cases in DPP4 inhibitor users, giving incidence rates per 10,000 of 1.33 and 1.46, respectively, a nonsignificant difference (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31).
  • Papillary thyroid cancer was the most common thyroid cancer subtype, followed by follicular and medullary, with no significant increases in risk with GLP-1 RAs by cancer type, although the numbers were small.
  • In the SGLT2 inhibitor comparison, there was also no significantly increased thyroid cancer risk for GLP-1 RAs (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.65-2.05).

IN PRACTICE:

“Given the upper limit of the confidence interval, the findings are incompatible with more than a 31% increased relative risk of thyroid cancer. In absolute terms, this translates to no more than 0.36 excess cases per 10 000 person-years, a figure that should be interpreted against the background incidence of 1.46 per 10,000 person-years among the comparator group in the study populations.”

SOURCE:

This study was conducted by Björn Pasternak, MD, PhD, of the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and colleagues. It was published online on April 10, 2024, in The BMJ.

LIMITATIONS:

Relatively short follow-up for cancer risk. Risk by individual GLP-1 RA not analyzed. Small event numbers. Observational, with potential for residual confounding and time-release bias.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Pasternak was supported by a consolidator investigator grant from Karolinska Institutet. Some of the coauthors had industry disclosures.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

New Drug Approvals Are the Wrong Metric for Cancer Policy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Most Cancer Trial Centers Located Closer to White, Affluent Populations
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Few Childhood Cancer Survivors Get Recommended Screenings
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Active Surveillance for Cancer Doesn’t Increase Malpractice Risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
A Banned Chemical That Is Still Causing Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Should Opioids Be Used for Chronic Cancer Pain?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Virtual Reality Brings Relief to Hospitalized Patients With Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Less Than 50% of Accelerated Approvals Show Clinical Benefit
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Repeat MCED Testing May ID Early-Stage and Unscreened Cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Early Treatment Response in Patients With HER2-Positive Cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology