Latest News

FDA Proposes that Interchangeability Status for Biosimilars Doesn’t Need Switching Studies


 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued new draft guidance that does not require additional switching studies for biosimilars seeking interchangeability. These studies were previously recommended to demonstrate that switching between the biosimilar and its reference product showed no greater risk than using the reference product alone.

“The recommendations in today’s draft guidance, when finalized, will provide clarity and transparency about the FDA’s thinking and align the review and approval process with existing and emerging science,” said Sarah Yim, MD, director of the FDA’s Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars in a statement on June 20. “We have gained valuable experience reviewing both biosimilar and interchangeable biosimilar medications over the past 10 years. Both biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars meet the same high standard of biosimilarity for FDA approval and both are as safe and effective as the reference product.”

An interchangeable status allows a biosimilar product to be swapped with the reference product without involvement from the prescribing provider, depending on state law.

While switching studies were not required under previous FDA guidance, the 2019 document did state that the agency “expects that applications generally will include data from a switching study or studies in one or more appropriate conditions of use.”

However, of the 13 biosimilars that received interchangeability status, 9 did not include switching study data.

“Experience has shown that, for the products approved as biosimilars to date, the risk in terms of safety or diminished efficacy is insignificant following single or multiple switches between a reference product and a biosimilar product,” the FDA stated. The agency’s investigators also conducted a systematic review of switching studies, which found no differences in risk for death, serious adverse events, and treatment discontinuations in participants switched between biosimilars and reference products and those that remained on reference products.

“Additionally, today’s analytical tools can accurately evaluate the structure and effects [of] biologic products, both in the lab (in vitro) and in living organisms (in vivo) with more precision and sensitivity than switching studies,” the agency noted.

The FDA is now calling for commentary on these draft recommendations to be submitted by Aug. 20, 2024.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

FDA Expands Durvalumab Label to Endometrial Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ChatGPT Enhances Readability of Cancer Information for Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Doctors Endorsing Products on X May Not Disclose Company Ties
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
US Hospitals Prone to Cyberattacks Like One That Impacted Patient Care at Ascension, Experts Say
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
See the Medical World Through Neurodivergent Doctors’ Eyes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medicare Advantage Plans Not Always Advantageous
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Oncology Mergers Are on the Rise. How Can Independent Practices Survive?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Is This Journal Legit? Predatory Publishers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CMS Announces End to Cyberattack Relief Program
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Scope of Practice Concerns Lead to Hospital’s Temp Ban on CRNAs
MDedge Hematology and Oncology