From the Journals

Modest Gains Shown in Breast Cancer Immunotherapy Trials


 

TOPLINE:

Breast cancer immunotherapy trials yield modest clinical impact, with a quarter of trials failing to report their outcomes, particularly among single-center studies which are more likely to go unreported, and many phase 2 studies failing to translate into successful phase 3 trials.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Few immunotherapy agents — only pembrolizumab in the United States, as of December 2023, and atezolizumab in Europe — have received approvals for use in patients with breast cancer, indicating low returns on the large number of breast cancer immunotherapy trials launched in the early 2010s.
  • In this cross-sectional study, researchers evaluated 331 immunotherapy trials, initiated between January 2004 and April 2023, that enrolled 48,844 patients with breast cancer.
  • Of these, 47 were phase 1 trials, 242 were phase 2 trials, and 42 were phase 3 trials.
  • A trial was considered reported if the results were posted on ClinicalTrial.gov or reported as an abstract or a manuscript.
  • Overall, 120 trials met their completion date up to November 2022; of these, 30 (25%) failed to report outcomes, which included two phase 3 trials.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Phase 1 trials had the highest rate of nonreporting (31.8%), followed by phase 2 (23.6%) and phase 3 (22.2%) trials.
  • Single-center studies were more likely to be unreported than multicenter studies (35.2% vs 15.0%; P = .02).
  • Of 90 reported trials, 47 (52.2%) met their primary endpoints and 43 (47.8%) did not.
  • The majority, 17 out of 19 (89.5%), of the reported randomized trials had negative results.

IN PRACTICE:

“The findings of this study suggest that the large number of immunotherapy trials being run have yielded modest clinical impact,” the authors wrote. “More selective initiation of phase 2 trials, grounded in preclinical and biomarker observations and with optimal statistical designs for early efficacy assessment, is needed to increase trial efficiency.”

SOURCE:

The study, led by Marco Mariani, MD, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, was published online in JAMA Network Open.

LIMITATIONS:

The study’s reliance on ClinicalTrials.gov as the primary source of trial data might have resulted in some trials being overlooked. In addition, manual data extraction could cause inaccuracies and potentially introduced biases in the interpretation of trial results. Primary study completion date cutoff of December 2022 could have excluded significant data from more recent trials.

DISCLOSURES:

This study received support via Susan Komen Leadership Grant and the Fondazione AIRC per la Ricerca sul Cancro. Several authors reported receiving grants and personal fees and having other ties with various sources.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Greater Transparency of Oncologists’ Pharma Relationships Needed
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Circulating Tumor DNA Hints at BC Recurrence Risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Black Women With Breast Cancer Face Clinical Inequities
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
What Does Hormone Receptor Mean in BRCA-Associated BC?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Which Patients With Early TNBC Can Avoid Chemotherapy?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Outcomes with CDK4/6 Inhibitors Vary in BC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ancient Viruses in Our DNA Hold Clues to Cancer Treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The Last 30 Days: How Oncologists’ Choices Affect End-of-Life Cancer Care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Approves First Engineered Cell Therapy for a Solid Tumor
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Can Addressing Depression Reduce Chemo Toxicity in Older Adults?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology